Census Tract 74.01 | Barry Farm | Washington, D.C.

Principal Investigator: Tanya Golash-Boza

Creative Director: Patrick Coldivar-Valencia. Contributors: Carmen Salazar, Briana Aguilar, Diana Alvarado-Cuevas


Welcome to the Census tract 74.01 profile

This story map is designed to allow you to assess the level of gentrification in one small area: Census tract 74.01, located in the Anacostia neighborhood of Washington, D.C. Gentrification can be measured quantitatively using three indicators: 1) change in median household income; 2) change in percentage of residents with a college degree; and 3) change in median housing value. Based on these measures, we would conclude that Census tract 74.01 has not gentrified. Between 2000 and 2018, the median household income in Census tract 74.01 decreased from $20,680 to $13,750; the percentage of people over the age of 25 with a college degree increased from 2% to 8%; and the median home value increased from $209,835 to $247,200. Although racial change is not technically included in the measure of gentrification (which focuses on economic changes), it is often part of the popular definition. Thus, it is worth noting that the Black population of this tract decreased from 98% in 2000 to 92% in 2018. This story map takes a close look at the physical landscape of the neighborhood to assess the level of public and private investment. You can compare this tract to three others: Census tract  21.02  (Kennedy Street), Census tract  72  (Navy Yard), Census tract  99.03  (Central Avenue), and Census tract  87.01  (Eckington).

This Census tract profile provides a detailed analysis of Census tract 74.01 (Barry Farm) in Washington, District of Columbia (D.C.). We use ArcGIS, a geographic information system maintained by the Environmental Systems Research Institute, to create an interactive map to show the levels of public and private investment in Census tract 74.01. We reference the U.S. Census Bureau (2018), with data provided by the Census Reporter, to examine economic, housing, education, and demographic statistics. We also reference  Jackelyn Hwang’s (2015) Google Street View Gentrification Observations Supplementary Material  to assess visible indicators of reinvestment associated with gentrification.

To navigate through different sections of this Census tract profile, refer to the table of contents at the top of this story map.


Background and history


Visible signs of neighborhood change


Indicators of investment and disinvestment

Census tract 74.01 had a median household income that was below the citywide median in 2000, and it has only decreased moderately since. Thus, according to most measures of gentrification, you would conclude the tract has not gentrified. The content below provides an empirical description of what has and has not changed so that you can assess the level of investment and disinvestment for yourself.

Indicators of investment

Please reference the description and Google Street View for each indicator in the following section, below. The indicators of investment include the following: signs discouraging disorder, vacant area or public street beautification, new public courtesies, new signs or structures controlling traffic, new large scale development(s) that includes affordable housing, residences with new patio furniture or landscaping, and residences with minor upgrades.

Indicators of disinvestment

Please reference the description and Google Street View for each indicator in the following section, below. The indicators of disinvestment include the following: litter, unkempt vacant area or public street frontage, abandoned or boarded up structure(s), structures with minor exterior decay, structures with major exterior decay, and structures with metal fences or gates.


Conclusion of Census tract 74.01 profile

This Census tract profile shows the results of a survey of public and private investment and disinvestment in Census tract 74.01 (Barry Farm) in the Washington District of Columbia (D.C.). We drew from Jackelyn Hwang’s (2015) Google Street View Gentrification Observations Supplementary Material to develop this housing survey. Using ArcGIS, we offer an interactive map to show various forms of investment and disinvestment. Referencing data from the U.S. Census Bureau (2018), provided by Census Reporter, we offer an examination of economics, housing, education, and demographic statistics

We thank Mara Cherkasky and Sarah Jane Shoenfeld, historians at  Prologue DC , for their contributions to this story map.

Please refer to the main page to explore the case study that examines the indicators and effects of gentrification for four other Census tracts, Census tract 21.02 (Kennedy Street), Census tract 72 (Navy Yard), Census tract 99.03 (Central Avenue), and Census tract 87.01 (Eckington). Just click the button found below to navigate to the page.

Census Tract 74.01 | Washington, District of Columbia (D.C.)

ArcGIS Census tract 74.01 interactive map

The University of California Merced (UCM), Health Services Research Institute (HSRI), Undergraduate Research in the Humanities (UROC-H)

Qualitative Google Street View

Jackelyn Hwang’s (2015) Google Street View Gentrification Observations Supplementary Material

Census tract 74.01 statistics

U.S. Census Bureau (2018), provided by Census Reporter

Creative Director