Story Map Census Tract 99.03| Central Avenue|Washington, D.C
Principal Investigator: Tanya Golash-Boza. Creative Director: David Villegas. Contributors: Carmen Salazar.
Welcome to the Census tract 99.03 profile
This story map is designed to allow you to assess the level of gentrification in one small area: Census tract 99.03, located in the Capitol View neighborhood of Washington, D.C. Gentrification can be measured quantitatively using three indicators: 1) change in median household income; 2) change in percentage of residents with a college degree; and 3) change in median housing value. Based on these measures, we would conclude that Census tract 99.03 has gentrified. Between 2000 and 2018, the median household income in Census tract 99.03 increased 81.3%; the percentage of people over the age of 25 with a college degree increased 179.6%; and the median home value increased 115.1%. Although racial change is not technically included in the measure of gentrification (which focuses on economic changes), it is often part of the popular definition. Thus, it is worth noting that the Black population of this tract decreased from 98% in 2000 to 93% in 2018. Tract 99.03 is unusual among D.C. Census tracts in that it has experienced gentrification without significant changes in the percentage of Black residents. This story map takes a close look at the physical landscape of the neighborhood to assess visible indicators of investment and disinvestment. You can compare this tract to four others: Census tract 21.02 (Kennedy Street), Census tract 72 (Navy Yard), Census tract 74.01 (Barry Farms), and Census tract 87.01 (Eckington).
This Census tract profile is a qualitative analysis of investment and disinvestment for Census tract 99.03 (Central Avenue) in Washington, District of Columbia (D.C.). We use ArcGIS, a geographic information system maintained by the Environmental Systems Research Institute, to create an interactive map to show the characteristics of Census tract 99.03. We reference the U.S. Census Bureau (2018), with data provided by the Census Reporter, to examine economic, housing, education, and demographics statistics. We also reference Jackelyn Hwang’s (2015) Google Street View Gentrification Observations Supplementary Material to assess visible indicators of disinvestment and reinvestment.
To navigate through different sections of this Census tract profile, refer to the table of contents at the top of this story map.
Background and history
History of Census tract 99.03
Census tract 99.03, located in the Capitol View neighborhood, was once the home of the Anacostans (also called the Nacotchtank) — the Indigenous people who lived on this land prior to the arrival of British settlers. Later, this area was part of the Maryland colony, and then the state of Maryland. In 1791 it became part of the new, 10-square-mile District of Columbia.
This area remained largely undeveloped until the 20th century. This map from 1894 shows that the land where Census tract 99.03 lies was divided into two areas – one owned by Fred G. Aukman, and one by Ammon Behrend, and that the area remained undeveloped.
Ten years later, in 1903 , the land owned by Behrend was still undeveloped and the land owned by Aukman had recently been subdivided into lots.
In the 1920s, a few Black families bought land and houses in this rural area at the edge of city. Black dentist and Capitol View resident William Collins recalled that Black men raced their horses and dogs on tracks in the hills of the undeveloped areas in the 1920s.
In the 1930s, a few more Black families purchased homes in this area, as did a few White families. This map from 1932 shows the land had been further subdivided and some houses had been built and more roads constructed.
In 1940, the area where Census tract 99.03 is today was 35% White. By 1950, most of the White residents had left and the area was only 7% White. Between 1960 and 2000, the area remained nearly 100% Black.
In the first few decades of the twentieth century, Capitol View established itself as a middle-class Black enclave. In 1960, the area was 99% Black and 95% of residents owned their homes. Residents thus protested when they learned the National Capital Housing Authority planned to build a public housing project in their neighborhood. City officials pointed to the lack of available land in the inner city as well as the need for public housing and moved forward with their plans to build a housing project in the midst of this majority-Black community with a high percentage of homeowners and middle-class residents. The housing project was completed in 1955. The problems anticipated by the residents did not come immediately. This area had one of the lowest crime rates in the city from 1952 to 1965 . However, the sustained neglect of the housing projects and lack of opportunities for young Black men in the city eventually translated into high rates of crime.
May 16, 1970. Washington Post article
East Capitol Dwellings
In 1952 , the National Capital Park and Planning Commission approved the construction of East Capitol Dwellings. This housing project includes mostly two-story semi-detached houses, as well as a few three-story apartment buildings, and occupies about a quarter of the land area of the Census tract. The National Capital Housing Authority contracted with the Standard Construction Company to build it.
East Capitol Dwellings opened in 1955 to 577 Black families — 391 on the Southeast side and the remainder on the Northeast side of East Capitol Street. Renowned singer Marvin Gaye and his family were among the first residents. Like many others, they left low-income housing in Southwest to move to the complex. Gaye and his family lived in a unit on the Northeast side until about 1962.
This housing project showed signs of disrepair in very short order – due to faulty construction and soil erosion issues. The heating system was inadequate from the beginning, and left many families cold all winter. Twenty years later, the heating issues persisted and residents also complained about the lack of hot water . Despite bitterly cold winters, residents dealt with inadequate heating every winter .
By 1970, the neighborhood had begun to experience high rates of crime — a problem that would worsen in years to come. In 1978, a woman who had confronted youths about selling drugs in front of her home in East Capitol Dwellings experienced a firebombing of her unit.
In 1971, a second major public housing project was sited in this area. This project was called Capitol View Plaza and included high rises as well as town houses. The new construction brought the number of families in public housing to over 1,000 in this small area.
In the early 1980s, residents expressed concern about the distribution of marijuana, PCP, and heroin in open-air drug markets . With youth unemployment rates at 50%, selling drugs was a way for young men to earn cash. Their parents often struggled to make ends meet with rising costs of food and rent . By 1986, young men began to deal crack cocaine. In Capitol View and across the city, homicide rates rose with the advent of open-air crack markets. In 1993, there were 17 homicides in East Capitol Dwellings — making it one of the most violent areas in the world.
In 2000, the city received a $30.8 million federal grant to demolish East Capitol Dwellings as well as the adjacent properties and replace them with mixed-income housing. In 2003, after 50 years of neglect and disrepair, East Capitol Dwellings was razed.
Capitol View Plaza Towers was a housing project built in 1971 and demolished in 2009. Today, East Capitol Urban Farm is in its place.
Evelyn Brown moved to East Capitol Dwellings in 1969 . She raised seven children there and led the tenants council. In the 1990s, her daughter as well as two of her nephews were gunned down near her home. Still, Ms. Brown, who was 70 years old in 2003, felt attached to the neighborhood. When the Dwellings was demolished, she used her Section 8 voucher to rent an apartment four blocks from her former apartment. She told the Washington Post she hoped to return to the new housing when construction was completed.
The Capitol Gateway project, funded by Hope VI, is designed as 761 mixed-income units, including more than 230 that will be sold. This project aims to provide the possibility of homeownership to 30 former public housing residents. The remaining homes are to be sold to people earning less than 115% of the median area income. The project plans also provides for a 100,000-square-foot retail center.
In 2005, the first phase of the Hope VI project was completed: a senior building with 151 units. An additional 142 townhomes for purchase and 86 for rent were completed soon afterwards. About a third of the residents of the Hope VI project — called “Capitol Gateway Estates” — had been among the 649 families relocated when East Capitol Dwellings was demolished. Steve Roseman, principal of Drew Elementary School, which served the children of East Capitol Dwellings, noted that the school lost almost 80% of its students when the housing projects were demolished. In 2003, 63.2% of students at Drew Elementary were proficient in math. By 2008, that percentage had dropped to 6.2%. Donna Comrie , who studied the effects of Hope VI on education, reports that residents of the Hope VI development did not send their children to Drew Elementary School, and the school lost its stability.
“America’s Finest Colored Community”
Much of the news coverage of Capitol View focuses on East Capitol Dwellings and the subsequent Hope VI grant, ignoring the rest of the community — which is not public housing but rather a longstanding Black homeowner community.
In the 1920s, a Black developer named John Whitelaw Lewis began developing Capitol View as a residential subdivision for African Americans. In the 1930s, he collaborated with the Capital View Realty Company, which was able to secure Federal Housing Administration -insured loans for Black families to purchase single-family homes in Capitol View. (N.B.: “Capitol” refers to the Capitol building and “Capital” to the city itself – thus the different spellings.)
The FHA did not generally insure loans for Black families in Black neighborhoods. However, the Capital View Realty Company was able to convince the FHA that this would be an elite Black subdivision with stone and brick homes that featured oak floors and tiled bathrooms with tubs and showers.
This map – created by researchers at Prologue DC – shows that in 1937, the FHA graded Capitol View “H” – the lowest rating. An “H” rating referred to areas “developed especially for negroes or have been left open for negroes to build for themselves” – an accurate description of the area. Nevertheless, the map shows the FHA insured at least one loan in this area – for the house at 60 53rd Place SE, a house built in 1924. More research needs to be done to learn if there were other FHA-backed loans issued in this area.This map – created by researchers at Prologue DC – shows that in 1937, the FHA graded Capitol View “H” – the lowest rating. An “H” rating referred to areas “developed especially for negroes or have been left open for negroes to build for themselves” – an accurate description of the area. Nevertheless, the map shows the FHA insured at least one loan in this area – for the house at 60 53rd Place SE, a house built in 1924. More research needs to be done to learn if there were other FHA-backed loans issued in this area.
In 1936, the Afro-American newspaper called Capitol View “America’s finest colored community.” Black newspapers frequently ran ads and articles promoting this fine development. In 1939 , the Capital View Realty Company built four two-story brick and cinder block houses between 5333 and 5341 East Capitol Street, at a cost of $17,500 — or $4,375 each. Harry W. Lucas , a porter for Presidents Harding, Coolidge, Hoover, and Roosevelt, bought the house at 5333 East Capitol Street and lived there until he passed away in 1950. His wife, Mrs. Amelia Lucas was still living there in 1965 when her photo appeared in the New York Amsterdam News, showing her at the Nassau Golf Club during the Third Annual Pepsi-Cola International Golf Tournament. Mrs. Lucas worked for the Federal Trade Commission for more than 35 years and made her mark as an amateur golfer as well as a long-term federal employee. She passed away at age 69 in 1978.
Capitol View residents worked together to transform their neighborhood from a rural subdivision without basic amenities to a thriving urban community. Notably, they formed the Capitol View Civic Association over 90 years ago to address issues in the neighborhood such as unpaved streets and poor access to public transportation. Residents started a church in the home of one of the residents, Mrs. Turner, and eventually were able to secure funding to build the Capital View Baptist church in 1947, to a design by the well-known Black architect , R.C. Archer, Jr. They were successful in getting a bus to serve their community in July of 1938. In 1961, residents advocated directly to Congress to get a community library. The Capitol View Branch Library opened in 1965 and was recently renovated. The Capitol View Civic Association continues to be active and published a 20-page brochure in 2010 describing the illustrious history of their community.
The first elementary school for residents was the George Harris Richardson Elementary School, built in 1948. In 1949, Kelly Miller Junior High opened. Capitol View residents did not have an easily accessible high school until Woodson High School opened in 1972 .
The siting of large public housing developments in this area meant the neighborhood has had a mix of Black homeowners and Black public housing residents for several decades. The area has remained majority Black since its founding. In 2018, there were nearly 100 White residents in the Census tract — more than had been for over 50 years.
Visible signs of neighborhood change
Measuring investment and disinvestment
How to read and interact with this map
The map to the right shows various characteristics of Census tract 99.03 in Washington, D.C. Each of the map layers portrays a different characteristic associated with gentrification. The characteristics represent the gentrification indicators. Please expand the legend to view the different types of indicators as layers. Click on the double arrows in the upper-left corner of the map to see the legend (or hide it). Each layer can be checked on and off with the checkboxes on the left side of the map. The layers with a point represent the entire block. The layers of the fully-colored blocks represent each block's percentages with a given characteristic, displayed as a gradient. For example, if there is a point on a block in the "Major Decay" layer, that block contains at least one structure with significant decay. If a block in the "Minor Decay" layer is colored dark green, then a high percentage of the structures in that block contains minor decay. Click on any indicator to access information about your chosen indicator.
We used Google Street View to measure the lack of public and private disinvestment and the presence of public and private investment. We observed every block in Census tract 72 and measured the presence of disinvestment and investment using these indicators. Please refer to the table below to see our classification of investment and disinvestment indicators.
We present our findings below so that you can assess the level of investment and disinvestment in this Census tract for yourself. One of the goals of this project is to explore the extent to which these visual measures of public and private investment are correlated with quantitative measures of gentrification such as changes in median income, housing value, and educational attainment. You can refer to the Mapping Gentrification overview site for our analyses on this topic.
Demographics
Demographics for 2000 & 2018
Between 2000 and 2018, the median household income in tract 99.03 went from $28,110 to $51,023 (in constant 2018 dollars). The median home value went from $146,841 to $316,2000 (in constant 2018 dollars). In 2000, less than 10% of residents had finished college. By 2018, that had gone up to 26%. The rise in average income, home value, and median educational attainment between 2000 and 2018 in Capitol View is due to the demolition of public housing and the construction of mixed income housing through a Hope VI grant. The demolition of public housing led to the displacement of hundreds of Black families. The new residents are also nearly all Black, but are of higher socioeconomic status than the residents they replaced.
We use Google Street View to assess the levels of visible public and private investment in this neighborhood so that we can compare tract 99.03 to other neighborhoods.
Indicators of investment and disinvestment
Census tract 99.03 had a median household income that was right about the citywide median in 2000, and it has only increased moderately since. Thus, according to most measures of gentrification, you would conclude the tract is in early stages of gentrification. The content below provides an empirical description of what has and has not changed so that you can assess the level of investment and disinvestment for yourself.
Indicators of investment
Please reference the description and Google Street View for each indicator in the following section, below. The indicators of investment include the following: signs discouraging disorder, new public courtesies, new large-scale development(s) that includes residencies with new patio furniture or landscaping.
Signs discouraging disorder
What do signs discouraging disorder represent?
Signs discouraging disorder include anti-littering/loitering/drug use/vandalism/graffiti, neighborhood watch (i.e., “area monitored by metropolitan police”).
What does this Google Street View showcase?
This is a Google Street View image that represents signs discourage mischief/disturbances and informs the community and visitors that a neighborhood watch is in function at 86 57th Pl SE, Washington, DC 20019 as of August 2014 (Source: Google Street View 2021).
Signs discouraging disorder
What does this map showcase?
This map illustrates locations with signs that associate with anti-loitering, anti-littering, anti-drug use, anti-vandalism, anti-graffiti, or neighborhood watch. The colored point symbols suggest signs discouraging disorder (Source: ArcGIS). Please click on the double arrows in the upper-left corner of this map to access a visual detail of the symbols used on this map. Click on any indicator to access information about your chosen indicator.
New public courtesies
The before picture
What do public courtesies signify?
Public courtesies signify an addition of either crosswalks, bus stops, bike racks, trash bins, or street lamps to the vicinity.
What does this Google Street View showcase?
This Google Street View image shows the minimal presence of public courtesy in the vicinity of 199 57th PL SE, Washington, D.C. 20019 in November 2007 (Source: Google Street View 2021).
New public courtesies
The after picture
What does this Google Street View showcase?
This Google Street View image shows the most recent public courtesies and accounts for a distinguishable crosswalk and accessibility to the sidewalk in the vicinity of 199 57th PL SE, Washington, D.C. 20019, (Source: Google Street View 2020).
New public courtesies
What does this map showcase?
This map illustrates locations that have an addition of either road implementations, addition to the Flor, and crosswalks to the vicinity. The colored point symbols indicate the presence of new public courtesies within the vicinity (Source: ArcGIS). Please click on the double arrows in the upper-left corner of this map to access a visual detail of the symbols used on this map. Click on any indicator to access information about your chosen indicator.
New large scale development(s)
The before picture
What defines a large scale development?
Large scale developments include any new large buildings that occupy at least 75% of the block.
What does this Google Street View showcase?
This Google Street View image shows the area prior to the development of a park like area, filling the vacancy between housing structures at 11 57th PL SE, Washington, D.C. 20019, in August 2009. (Source: Google Street View 2021).
New large scale development(s)
The after picture
What does this Google Street View showcase?
This Google Street View image shows the new large development of a new green area between residencies at 11 57th PL SE, Washington, D.C. 20019, in June 2019 (Source: Google Street View 2021).
New large scale development(s)
What does this map showcase?
This map illustrates the larger scaled developments in the Capitol View area. The indicated marker shows exactly which out stood in the vicinity of 11 57th PL SE, Washington, D.C. 20019 (Source: Esri). Please click on the double arrows in the upper-left corner of this map to access a visual detail of the symbols used on this map. Click on any indicator to access information about your chosen indicator.
Residences with new patio furniture or landscaping
The before picture
What do residences with new patio furniture or landscaping include?
Residences with new patio furniture or landscaping include patio or yard furniture or accessories that go beyond ordinary grass maintenance within the vicinity.
What does this Google Street View showcase?
This Google Street View image shows the earlier conditions of residences indicate the minor presence of patio furniture or landscaping in the vicinity of 5401 E Capitol St SE, Washington, D.C. 20019, in November 2007 (Source: Google Street View 2021).
Residences with new patio furniture or landscaping
The after picture
What does this Google Street View showcase?
This Google Street View image shows a residence with a well maintained yard with removal of old furniture in the vicinity of 5401 E Capitol St SE, Washington, DC 20019, in June 2019 (Source: Google Street View 2021).
Residences with new patio furniture or landscaping
What does this map showcase?
This map illustrates residences with new patio furniture or landscaping that go beyond ordinary grass maintenance within the vicinity. The darker shades of color suggest an increased presence of residences with new patio furniture or landscaping within the vicinity (Source: ArcGIS). Please click on the double arrows in the upper-left corner of this map to access a visual detail of the symbols used on this map. Click on any indicator to access information about your chosen indicator.
Conclusion of Census tract 99.03 profile
This Census tract profile shows the results of a survey of public and private investment and disinvestment in Census tract 99.03 (Central Avenue) in Washington, District of Columbia (D.C.). We drew from Jackelyn Hwang’s (2015) Google Street View Gentrification Observations Supplementary Material to develop this housing survey. Using ArcGIS, we offer an interactive map to show various forms of investment and disinvestment. Referencing data from the U.S. Census Bureau (2018), provided by Census Reporter, we offer an examination of economics, housing, education, and demographic statistics.
We thank Mara Cherkasky and Sarah Jane Shoenfeld, historians at Prologue DC , for their contributions to this story map.
Please refer to the main page to explore the case study that examines the indicators and effects of gentrification for four other Census tracts, Census tract 72 (Navy Yard), Census tract 74.01 (Barry Farm), Census tract 21.02 (Kennedy St), and Census tract 87.01 (Eckington). Just click the button found below to navigate to the page.