Rethinking Retail Land Portfolios

How to Grow Housing Supply

Introduction

The Infrastructure Institute at the School of Cities, University of Toronto, partnered with the Education and Research group at Esri Canada to investigate the potential for redevelopment of underused private land.

While public land is the obvious choice when it comes to finding sites for affordable housing, what is the potential of private land portfolios? Can we balance the interests of private landowners with public ones of affordable housing and other uses?

We asked these questions in our study. Taking just six major retail chains that operate across Toronto, we used Esri ArcGIS software to generate hypothetical development scenarios on their underused sites. The results were stunning, revealing enormous potential to build housing and to provide spaces for social infrastructure.

Why Now?

The City of Toronto is in the midst of a housing crisis, with a shortage of larger sized units, affordable housing, and critical public services. The COVID-19 pandemic has magnified the issue, resulting in an urgent need to dramatically increase the supply of housing.

To date, the City has taken a significant policy response to help expedite the redevelopment of publicly-owned lands. Toronto's Housing Now program and Create TO agency are prime examples that will fast-track the building of 10,000 housing units, including 3,700 affordable rental units.

Often overlooked or downplayed, however, is the potential for the rapid redevelopment of privately-owned land portfolios.

Why Private?

Privately owned land is a largely untapped resource, with many private landholders owning multiple sites that constitute underused land - that is, property that has more development potential than is currently being utilized. Prime examples include large, single-storey grocery and big box retail stores with substantial surface parking. These sites have the potential to be redeveloped as transit-oriented or mixed-use projects, with the existing retail use profitably rebuilt into buildings that co-locate market and affordable housing, retail, and social services.

A few high-profile landowners including Choice REIT have already begun the process of redeveloping some of their underused sites. This is a trend that is just getting started (see below).

Proposed redevelopments from left to right: Choice Properties' sites at 25 Photography Drive and 682-742 Broadview Avenue, the Beer Store property at 227 Gerrard St E, 1285 Queen St E, and 28 River St. (Source from left to right, top to bottom: Choice Properties REIT, Choice Properties REIT, Stafford Homes, Fieldgate Urban, Liberty Development and Spotlight Development Inc.)

With the City’s target goal of 44,000 affordable units (40,000 rental, 4,000 ownership) to be met by 2030 under the affordable housing requirements stipulated under the new Inclusionary Zoning Policy, public lands alone will not be enough to deliver the needed housing. Moving forward, harnessing the development potential of large private landowners will be crucial in supplementing the delivery of affordable housing supply and the creation of complete communities with the essential social infrastructure.

Our Approach

We used Esri software to analyze and identify privately owned sites with high potential for redevelopment, and explore the extent of the development potential. Our approach comprises five steps which are summarized below.


1

Mapping

We first mapped out the real estate holdings and operational facilities of six high-profile private land owners in Toronto:

  • The Beer Store
  • Canadian Tire
  • Choice Reit
  • Ikea
  • Metro Grocery
  • Sobeys Grocery

Please click the address points to view address information.


2

Narrowing Site Selection

Sites that did not meet the minimum conditions for consideration were removed, including properties that were:

  • Part of a strip mall
  • Within the flood plain
  • Proposed for redevelopment
  • Part of existing mid- or high-rise buildings

3

Generating Massing

Massings were generated in ArcGIS Urban as mixed-use building forms based on regulations and standards outlined in the Toronto Zoning By-Law, planning policy, and urban design guidelines, as well as nearby development proposals. Residential, non-residential, indoor amenity, and greenspace space use types are represented with visually distinct symbology.


4

Calcuating Program & Units

Metrics were configured in ArcGIS Urban to estimate the total units, the number of each unit type (1-bedroom, 2-bedroom, etc.), and any required amenity or greenspace. Unit mix and percentage affordable housing were determined using the City of Toronto's Affordable Rental Housing Design Guidelines and Inclusionary Zoning Policy, respectively.


5

Identifying High Development Potential Sites

The sites were narrowed down further to identify those with high development potential, which were defined as sites that met a minimum of three of the following six criteria:

  • Zoning supports mixed-use
  • Minimum FSI allowance of 1.5
  • Minimum lot dimensions of 30 m x 30 m
  • Within 800 m of existing or proposed rapid transit stations
  • Within a designated Neighbourhood Improvement Area
  • Maximum zoning height or precedent within 800 m of at least 19.5 m (~6 storeys)

Key Findings

After generating the massing in ArcGIS Urban, we analyzed the findings and have summarized them in this section.

A perspective of the generated massings indicative of potential redevelopment in ArcGIS Urban

1) Enormous Development Potential

The program breakdown of the total floor area

Redevelopment of these 65 sites alone could generate a staggering 7.35 million m 2  of new development, including 5.51 million m 2  of new residential floor area, which translates to approximately 68,576 residential units. Additionally, around 700,000 m 2  of greenspace, 300,000 m 2 , and 1,000,000 m 2  of amenity and non-residential uses like retail, social purpose, and community uses could be realized.

2) Opportunity for Larger-Sized Family Units

There is a strong opportunity to direct development towards larger family sized units which are currently in short supply. Even if only 10% of units were mandated to be 3+ bedroom units (below our analysis' 15%), over 6,000 units could still be generated with 3 or more bedrooms.

3) A Significant Contribution to Affordable Housing Targets

Using Toronto's Inclusionary Zoning Policy to calculate the number of affordable units, it is clear that redeveloping underused private sites can significantly contribute to the City's affordable housing targets. Even if 10% of the 68,576 units were to be affordable housing units, this would produce around 6,858 units - a considerable portion of the City's goal of 44,000 affordable units by 2030.

4) Many Sites Could Host Multiple Buildings

Of the 65 sites, 48 were large enough to host multiple buildings, some of which would require a formal master planning process if developed. Such sites provide ample opportunity to foster complete communities through investment in public realm improvements, public infrastructure, and community amenities.

A representation of what 6,858 units of affordable housing could look like in mixed-use and various densities.

5) Most Sites are Already Development-Ready

Our analysis determined that 45 of the 65 sites already satisfy multiple criteria that make them suitable for redevelopment, including preferable existing zoning conditions, minimum ideal lot dimensions, and within close proximity to rapid transit.

Four Demonstration Concepts

In addition to assessing the extent of development potential, we have also re-imagined four of the high development potential sites. Design and streetscape refinements were carried out in ArcGIS CityEngine.

To view our demonstration concepts, please click on the four select sites below. To zoom in and out, orbit, or pan, please use the controls in the bottom right.

, , , and

Affordability Incentives

Despite the significant development potential from these six retailers alone, hindrances in the current market and the planning process could prevent its timely realization. The pace of redevelopment is slow and the inclusion of larger family sized units and social infrastructure uneven. Sites that ultimately developed still favour smaller-sized units and are targeted at the highest possible market rates for rentals and ownership. Public policy and a pro-active approach are needed to accelerate the redevelopment of underused land into mixed-use projects that truly support deep affordability and complete communities. Six potential incentives are explored below.

1) Accelerated Development Approvals

A program supporting an accelerated review process with criteria prioritizing affordable housing and other public benefits would incentivize developers by reducing costs and uncertainty associated with long approval processes.

The City of Toronto’s Concept 2 Keys program, launched in 2020, was formed with this intention. There are opportunities to re-evaluate the criteria for applications eligible towards the priority affordable housing development review stream, including criteria that encourage partnerships and multiple-site applications.

2) Density Bonuses

Density bonuses have proven to be an effective incentive for developers to include community benefits such as new parks and amenities, improved public realm and increased affordability.

The new Community Benefits Charges (CBC) tool will redraw the density bonusing system in Ontario, replacing Section 37. It could speed up the development process by outlining the community benefits required for development projects (and thus more predictable project costs). The preparation of the CBC strategy should consider ways to incentivize partnerships that optimize affordability and other benefits through multi-site projects.

3) Financial Incentives

Mixed-use projects that incorporate deeply affordable housing or social purpose uses often have development fees waived, and partnership with a reputable non-profit can provide access to government funding programs.

4) Local Support

Projects that incorporate public and non-profit services that are desired by local communities can garner crucial support from neighbourhood residents and local politicians, when paired with early and authentic community engagement.

5) Create Partnership Ecosystems

Fostering meaningful partnerships between public, private and non-profits through identification of interested organizations and establishment of collaboration venues can accelerate the formation of these collaborations and reduce risk.

6) Investing under an ESG Framework

An opportunity exists to reframe collaborative development projects as a strategy to provide community needs as an ESG (environmental, social, and governance) goal, which already exists in many corporate responsibility statements.

Summary

Our study has shown an impressive level of development from just six private landowners alone. Imagine the housing, services, and public benefits that could be delivered if many major landholders in the city were to accelerate the redevelopment of their underused sites!

Proper policy and incentives are required to motivate private landholders and accelerate development and partnership opportunities, including on smaller sites that collectively comprise an abundance of land. As the Inclusionary Zoning Policy is rolled out in Toronto, there is an opportunity to pair it with other incentive programs like those outlined in the previous section.

Lastly, there also needs to be an intentional mindset to integrate social purpose uses into redevelopment, ensuring that communities benefit from the transformation in their neighbourhoods. This can be realized through mutually advantageous collaborations between private, public or non-profit partners that result in innovative creative mixed-use buildings. Ultimately, collaborative partnerships will be key to moving forward, enabling private landowners to deliver significant housing supply, including affordable housing, in ways that can accelerate, co-finance and generate broad public support.

The Red Door Family Shelter is an example of critical social infrastructure built into a creative mixed-use building that otherwise would have remained only for private use. It is co-located with condominium and retail uses.

Sources & References

Paper References

Barker, P. (2018) Prepare for the rise of the mid-rise. Toronto Sun. Retrieved from: https://torontosun.com/life/homes/new-homes-and-condos/prepare-for-the-rise-of-the-mid-rise

BILD (2021) Affordable Housing in the City of Toronto – A Responsibility We All Share. Retrieved from: https://bildgta.ca/Assets/Associate%20Awards/Inclusionary%20Zoning%20in%20Toronto%20-%20Final.pdf

City of Toronto (2021) Housing & Homelessness Research & Reports. Retrieved from: https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/data-research-maps/research-reports/housing-and-homelessness-research-and-reports/.

City of Toronto (2021) Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards. Retrieved from: https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/official-plan-guidelines/design-guidelines/mid-rise-buildings/

City of Toronto (2009). Staff Report – Official Plan Amendment to Encourage the Development of Units for Households with Children. Retrieved from: https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-24366.pdf

Centre for Urban Research and Land Development - CUR (2019) Governments in Ontario Making Headway in Using Surpllus Lands for Housing. https://www.ohba.ca/cur-report-surplus-and-underutilized-government-lands-key-to-home-ownership/

CMHC (2018) About Affordable Housing in Canada. Retrieved from: https://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en/professionals/industry-innovation-and-leadership/industry-expertise/affordable-housing/about-affordable-housing/affordable-housing-in-canada

Galea, I. (2021). United Way aims to help Toronto’s Golden Mile recover from decades of job losses. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-united-way-aims-to-help-torontos-golden-mile-recover-from-decades-of/

Government of Ontario (2019) Province Sells Underutilized Land to Make Way for Affordable Housing. Government and Consumer Services. Retrieved from: https://news.ontario.ca/en/release/52012/province-sells-underutilized-land-to-make-way-for-affordable-housing

Habitat for Humanity (2019) The Solution to the Affordable Housing Crisis: Surplus and Underutilized Lands. Retrieved from: https://habitathm.ca/solution-affordable-housing-crisis-surplus-underutilized-lands/

King, M. (2019) Toronto leads the way for the global urban mixed-use trend. Special to the Globe and Mail. Retrieved from: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/industry-news/property-report/article-toronto-leads-the-way-for-the-global-urban-mixed-use-trend/

Li, Fei (2021) Mandatory Inclusionary Housing in London: Inclusion, Integration and Housing Production. IMFG Presentation. Retrieved from: https://munkschool.utoronto.ca/imfg/uploads/550/imfgpresentation_inclusionary_zoning_fei_li_february_23_2021.pdf

Murphy, J. and M. Hills (2021) Canada federal election: A look at the key numbers driving the campaign. BBC News. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-58426147

National Bank of Canada (2022) Housing Affordability Monitor Q1 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.nbc.ca/content/dam/bnc/en/rates-and-analysis/economic-analysis/housing-affordability.pdf

PwC, Urban Land Institute (2022) Emerging Trends in Real Estate. Retrieved from: https://www.pwc.com/ca/en/industries/real-estate/emerging-trends-in-real-estate.html

School of Cities (2021) Why Not Theatre Space Project Market Scan. Advisory Report. Available here: https://canurb.org/wp-content/uploads/WNT-Space-Project-Market-Scan_Final.pdf

Shipman, C. and M. Siemiatycki. (2018) The Art of Sharing: Opportunities and Constraints for Creative Mixed-Use Projects in Toronto.

Siemiatycki, M. (2017): Developing homeless shelters through public–private partnerships: The case of the Red Door Family Shelter in Toronto, Journal of Urban Affairs.

Victor, F. (2021) Facts about Homelessness in Toronto. Retrieved from: https://www.fredvictor.org/facts-about-homelessness-in-toronto/

Imagery (Textures)

CC BY 2.0

Seier+seier. (2010). Free seamless texture, white ash wood floor, seier+seier. [Image, lightened and resized]. WordPress.  https://wordpress.org/openverse/image/480b2837-0896-4fbe-8fa9-d62a872401c9 

Leontowicz, C. (2011). White Texture 002. [Image]. WordPress.  https://wordpress.org/openverse/image/37610ab9-83e54283-a42b-124d434f6a86 

Freepik License

PVProductions. (n.d.) Dark brown brick wall, creative back-phonon, closeup. Freepik.  https://www.freepik.com/freephoto/dark-brown-brick-wall-creative-back-phonon-closeup_9508015.htm#page=2&query=brown%20brick%20 texture&position=0&from_view=search 

Rawpixel. (n.d.). White concrete wall. [Image, lightened]. Freepik.  https://www.freepik.com/free-photo/white-concretewall_4410360.htm#query=wall%20texture&position=0&from_view=search 

Rawpixel. (n.d.). Metallic background. [Image]. Freepik.   https://www.freepik.com/free-photo/metallic-background_2767104. htm#query=metal&position=22&from_view=search 

3D Models

CC BY 4.0

CARLA. (n.d.). Air Conditioner 2. [3D Model]. CARLA.   https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

CARLA. (n.d.). ATM. [3D Model]. CARLA.  https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

CARLA. (n.d.). Bench 1. [3D Model]. CARLA.  https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

CARLA. (n.d.). Bench 2. [3D Model]. CARLA.  https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

CARLA. (n.d.). Bench 3. [3D Model]. CARLA.  https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

CARLA. (n.d.). Bike Rack. [3D Model]. CARLA.  https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

CARLA. (n.d.). Chair. [3D Model]. CARLA.  https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

CARLA. (n.d.). Clothing Container. [3D Model]. CARLA.  https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

CARLA. (n.d.). Kiosk 2. [3D Model]. CARLA.  https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

CARLA. (n.d.). Park Bench. [3D Model].  CARLA. https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

CARLA. (n.d.). Pergola. [3D Model]. CARLA.  https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

CARLA. (n.d.). Plastic Chair. [3D Model]. CARLA.  https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

CARLA. (n.d.). Shopping Cart. [3D Model]. CARLA.   https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

CARLA. (n.d.). Shopping Trolley. [3D Model]. CARLA.  https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

CARLA. (n.d.). Swing Couch. [3D Model]. CARLA.   https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

CARLA. (n.d.). Street Ad 4. [3D Model]. CARLA.  https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

CARLA. (n.d.). Table Round. [3D Model]. CARLA.   https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

CARLA. (n.d.). Wire Fence. [3D Model]. CARLA.  https://3dcitymodels.esri.ca/ 

The program breakdown of the total floor area

A representation of what 6,858 units of affordable housing could look like in mixed-use and various densities.

The Red Door Family Shelter is an example of critical social infrastructure built into a creative mixed-use building that otherwise would have remained only for private use. It is co-located with condominium and retail uses.