And Thus Entered Women:
The Beginnings of Co-Education at Holy Cross from 1967-1976
September 2022 marks the 50th Anniversary of Co-Education at Holy Cross. Several changes were made at Holy Cross during the years spanning 1967, when women attended classes during Co-Ed Day and 1976, when the first fully co-educational class walked across the stage at commencement.
This exhibit tells the story of these early women Crusaders through videos, news clippings, photographs and other archival materials drawn from the Holy Cross Archives and Distinctive Collections.
Parietal Hours: 1967-1970

Excerpt from the 1925 Student Handbook
The process leading to the acceptance of women at Holy Cross was very gradual. From 1843 to 1967, women, even students' mothers and sisters, were forbidden to visit them in their private rooms. This excerpt from the 1925 Student Handbooks shows how strongly the Administration felt about this policy at the time. This policy remained on the books until 1967.
In 1967, women were permitted to visit students' dorm rooms during parietal hours, or the time set aside for students to meet privately with women. Originally, parietal hours occurred during special events such as the Junior Prom, and the Military Ball. They also didn't extend beyond 8PM. The Student Government Association (SGA) petitioned for extended parietal hours.
A peaceful demonstration was held before members of the SGA presented their case to Dr. John E. Shay, Dean of Men. Over the next few years, these hours were extended after several discussions between the Dean's office and the SGA. By 1970, the individual Housing Councils were put in charge of writing policies governing visitors to dorm rooms.
1967 to 1971: The Coeducation Conversations
Women attend a class during the October 1967 Co-educational Day , Crusader, October 13, 1967
The discussions surrounding parietal hours were carried on concurrently with those regarding admitting women to Holy Cross. These conversations spanned from 1967, when the first Co-Ed Day was held, and 1971, when the Board of Trustees announced their decision to end the 129 year tradition of all-male education in the Fall of 1972. The SGA organized a Co-Education Day in October of 1967, to test the waters. Four hundred women from twelve colleges arrived at Holy Cross to experience a typical day in the life of a Holy Cross student
WBZ-TV reporter Shelby Scott interviewing two students, Crusader, October 13, 1967
The day was far from typical. As news cameras rolled, and reporters polled students about their feelings regarding co-education at Holy Cross, women arrived in droves. The Crusader reported that while they appreciated the experiment, most women felt there was a lack of academic programming and overall organization for the day. Respondents focused on the social nature of the day and agreed that it was a successful mixing of the sexes on campus.
The SGA held a Co-Educational Week in February of 1969. Don McClain, Dean of Men, was pleased by the event for the most part. In a statement for Today, a newsletter on campus, Dean McClain wrote, "in many ways Co-Ed Week has been an unqualified success . . . The professors have remarked favorably on the number and participation of young women in their classes. The Campus Center has been a focal point of interest with full participation in all events scheduled."
A woman unpacks for her stay at Holy Cross, Crusader, February 18, 1969
By late 1969, the SGA was concerned that co-education had been put aside in favor of other issues on campus. Thus organizers were especially pleased by the overall success of the November of 1969 Co-Ed Day as it brought the "dying issue of co-education into the forefront" in time for the Board of Trustees to vote on co-education in December. Almost 400 women arrived on campus and attended classes, lectures, and events. The one disappointment was that Co-Ed Day did not draw many Black women students.
Mulledy Hall (now Brooks Hall), 1967
While the students experienced life with women through co-educational events, the administration began to address the many challenges of housing women on campus through a series of reports and surveys. A study of the College's residence halls was carried out in 1968 to determine which was best suited for women's housing. The report included the dorms' maximum capacity, costs for renovating these spaces for women, as well as a list of key concerns to be addressed. Highest on this list was the need to provide privacy and security for the incoming women. Dean McClain concluded that both Mulledy (now Brooks Hall) and Wheeler were optimal choices as they provided the most private and secure living conditions. Mulledy was ultimately chosen. The College also conducted a survey of the Holy Cross community through the Arthur D. Little firm which showed that the community largely supported co-education.
However, even though the College community supported the inclusion of women and the administration was prepared to make the structural changes necessary to house them, the Board of Trustees of 1969 voted to delay their decision until 1971. Their reservations were likely fueled by the estimated $2 million it would cost to prepare the campus for women, along with other pressing issues facing the College.

Rev. John E. Brooks, S.J, circa 1960s-1970s
In 1970, Rev. John E. Brooks, S.J. succeeded Rev. Raymond Swords, S.J. as the 29th president of Holy Cross. One of his first actions as president was to push forward events that brought about co-education at Holy Cross. Upon his suggestion, a co-education committee was formed by the Board of Trustees in December of 1970. Fr. Brooks’ support, as well as the adjustment of the original inflated estimates for the budget for preparing the campus, led to the Board of Trustees voting in favor of co-education. He was quoted to say:
My reasons [for supporting co-education] were not primarily founded on civilizing the society at Holy Cross. My reasons were based really on what I understood Jesuit education to be, namely, an effort to educate leaders in our society. And at the same time I was quite aware that the status of women was changing rather quickly, and therefore if Holy Cross was to be truthful to its roots and traditions, and consistent, then it should be educating women as well as men, because it was obvious that women were on the threshold of gaining some rather significant leadership roles.
Photo Credit: McGann
1970 was also an important year in the history of co-education at Holy Cross as Eileen Tosney, the College's first woman registrar, was welcomed on campus. She was the only woman in an upper level administrative position at the time of her arrival. Tosney also served as chair of the Committee for the Status of Women at Holy Cross, a committee charged with ensuring the wellbeing of women at Holy Cross. Helen Whall, Professor emerita of English, remembered, "She and Sr. Anna Kane, S.S.J., '74, called that committee into being when such an entity was vital. Eileen insisted that women be taken seriously." (Holy Cross Magazine, Spring 2021, p.89) She served as a role model for countless women throughout her long career which spanned from 1970 to her retirement in 1996.
1972: The Beginning of Co-education
Pictured left to right: Diane L. Roy, Marian F. Earls, Mariann Gustowski, Jeanne M. Plasse, Justine M. Foley, and Maryann J. D'Amato
In September of 1972, the first women arrived at Holy Cross thus signaling the official start of co-education. Thirty women were accepted early decision into the class of 1975. Another 250 were accepted into the class of 1976. Six future members of the class of 1975 posed with the student handbook for the January 1972 edition of Crossroads, the alumni magazine, to mark this momentous occassion.
Preparations for the incoming women were complicated by the large class of freshmen in 1969, the largest freshman class as of that time. Members of that class received a memo asking them to consider remaining in their rooms rather than moving to more desirable housing to help house women in the same dormitory. The 1972 Housing Lottery became a great point of contention. Mulledy (now Brooks Hall), the dorm chosen to house the first women on campus, was also the newest and thus the most desirable choice for upperclassmen. This caused resentment. Karen Sitek Campito, '76, noted, "I think they overdid it in a way, giving us the nicest dorm - you know, there was a lot of resentment there, and a lot of women felt, well why shouldn't we have to just go through the same things that the other freshmen had to go through, living in the so-called 'freshmen dorms' . . . It's almost like they put you on a pedestal at first." (Cahill, p. 29)
Cynthia Ware (L) and Elise Hartman (R), Class of 1976
The women were further isolated by the security measures that kept them safe. The corridors in Mulledy Hall were locked and a receptionist fielded requests to visit residents. However, these measures had isolating effects on them. Deborah Fullham-Winston, '74, commented in Women on the Hill that living in Mulledy was "like living in a tower. We weren't exactly integrated into the community in any meaningful way." (Cahill, p. 29) Their placement also caused Freshmen women and men to be physically divided, making it very difficult for the class of 1975 to bond. Carlin Hall and Alumni Hall, traditionally the "Freshmen Dorms," were on the complete opposite end of campus from Mulledy Hall. They felt this divide psychologically as well. Maureen Dillon Greulich, '76 remembered, "We were on a stage. It was hard, it was very hard. Everything we did was somewhat analyzed, how we looked, how we dressed, and how bright we were . . ." (Cahill, p. 36)
Marilyn Boucher Butler, October 20, 1972
Marilyn Boucher Butler, Associate Dean of Students arrived at Holy Cross at the same time as the first women on campus. She served as their contact and helped them acclimate to life on campus. She was often called "Dean of Women" for her efforts on the part of women.
Butler also served as a guide for the administration as Holy Cross acclimated to the presence of women on campus. For instance, she was able to convince the administration that it was unnecessary to remove showers and install bathtubs in all of the women's bathrooms. In an interview for the College's 175th Anniversary she recalled, "One of the older Jesuit priests, who oversaw physical plant, had this idea that (he had done a lot of research) the showers needed to come out and bathtubs needed to be put in, so that the ladies could soak." However, one bathtub was installed in Mulledy Hall on his direction. ( https://www.holycross.edu/175th-anniversary/stories-and-coverage/sanctae-cruciana )
In 1972, activities designed for women were scarce. While they participated in co-ed student organizations such as the Crusader, Fenwick and ACT Theater, and Purple Key, there were few activities focused on women. This was especially true in the case of athletics. The Athletics department had stated that they were waiting for women to arrive to determine their interest in varsity sports but were ready to start intramural sports when they arrived. No plans were made until October. As Kathy Maloy, '74 recalled, "There was nothing. There were no sports to get involved in. They just didn't know what was going to happen yet, never mind have a women's team of any sport." (Cahill, p. 114)
Debra-Fullham-Winston, '74
In October, Debra Fulham-Winston formed a committee of women who worked with the Athletics Department and Rev. Francis Hart, S.J., Director of Intramural Sports, to plan the first women's athletics events on campus. Intramural tennis and basketball were made available during the fall semester and plans for other sports programs were made for that spring. However, there were no facilities for the women at the Field House, the home for intramural sports at Holy Cross, during that first year which led to many issues.
1973-1974 Men's Varsity Crew Team, Susan Keane, '75, the first woman coxwain, is pictured in the front row, 1974 Purple Patcher
Some progress towards women playing on varsity teams had been made by November 1972 when Sue Keane, '75 was placed on the 1973 varsity men's crew team. She said in an interview for the November 3, 1972, Crusader, "I originally intended to become a coxwain for a girl's crew, but the only spot left was on the four men crew. So Coach (Jim) Murphy put me there." (Crusader, November 3, 1972, p.12)
1973-1975: Transformative Years
1973
Wheeler Hall from the window of Beaven Hall, 1940
In the beginning of 1973, the changes created by co-education were only just being felt. One student commented in a Crusader poll that Holy Cross was "still somewhat an 'all-male school' with girls." (Crusader February 2, 1973, p.10) While most felt that women were largely accepted on campus, they reported that many still resented their presence. Both women and men stated that the administration was still giving women preferential treatment. One woman said, "Boys resent it when the Administration shows preference for the needs of women. Women should be treated as equally as possible to attain acceptance by men." (Crusader April 13, 1973, p.3) Much of this feeling of inequality was brought out by the extension of women's housing into Wheeler and Beaven Halls.
Programming focused on women increased in 1973. The Cross and Scroll, a student-run lecture series, hosted a women's forum in February 1973 entitled "Man's World, Woman's Place: A Women's Forum." Five key figures in the women's movement, including Elizabeth Janeway, author of the "Man's World, Woman's Place: a Study in Social Mythology,” spoke on the Equal Rights Amendment and presented workshops that touched on their lectures. Unfortunately the forum was scheduled on a Friday, which competed with parties. Maria B. Duvall, ex-1976, wrote in an editorial for the Crusader, "I was disappointed in the lack of turnout because if the women on this campus do not take themselves seriously enough to attend a forum like this, and begin to recognize some of the overt implications of sexism on this campus, then the sexism will continue to exist and to flourish through acceptance." (Crusader February 16, 1973, p.3)
Students Attending the Women's Forum, Crusader, February 16, 1973
The Women's Organization was also formed in 1973. This organization was dedicated to presenting lectures and workshops to inform and inspire women on campus. It also served to strengthen the women's sense of community on campus.
Diane Sepavich, first Director of Women's Athletic programming, Crusader, February 14, 1974
Opportunities for women to participate in sports and campus organizations also increased in 1973. Diane Sepavich, the first director of women's athletic programming at Holy Cross, was hired in November. She created athletics programming for women that included classes in gymnastics and co-ed volleyball.
Women's basketball intramurals, November 30, 1973
Sepavich also formed the first women's basketball team at that time. They began playing against area colleges the following spring. While Sepavich was responsible for recruiting the team, the actual coaching was performed by the team members themselves, thus showing their drive to succeed. They won their first game against Quinsigamond Community College on February 15, 1974.
Gail Buschmann, '77
Women continued to participate in intermural sports, including basketball and tennis. However the facilities had yet to improve for women. Gail Buschmann, '77, who won the women's intramural women's tennis tournament in 1973, said in an interview for the Crusader, "Although there is going to be a girl's team in the spring, I wish that we could have the advantages and facilities that the men's tennis team has. Their team has the use of the indoor courts in Shrewsbury during the winter. We don't." (Crusader, November 2, 1973, p. 13)
Some sports teams branched out to include women's teams. The women's crew team began practicing and women on the fencing team gained greater status on their team. Four womem. Kathy Swierzbin, '76, Sharon Labs, '76, Liz Maturo, '76, and Olivia Bettencourt, ex-1976, who had joined the co-ed fencing team the previous fall, began fencing officially as the women's foil team. Sharon Labs was chosen as co-captain along with Greg Bowe for the 1973-1974 season. The women's fencing team was recognized officially in 1975.
1972-1973 Fencing team including the Women's Foil team. Pictured in the first row L-R: Kathy Swierzbin, Sharon Labs, and Liz Maturo (Not Pictured: Olivia Bettencourt), Crusader, April 27, 1973
The Women's Organization continued to provide programs focusing on women. In her letter to Eileen Dooley, Director of Student Activities, Denise Carver, '76, wrote, "within the past year, the appearance of more women faculty members and female students has led to the formation of the Holy Cross Women's Organization. We hope to make the Holy Cross community both a relaxing and stimulating atmosphere for all women." (letter to Eileen Dooley, RE. The Women's Organization, RG 15.1A, Student Organizations, Women's Organizations, College of the Holy Cross Archives and Distinctive Collections)
1974
The co-education plan continued throughout 1974 as more dorms were renovated for women. By the fall of 1974, women's housing expanded to Alumni, Hanselmen, and Clark, thus making most of the existing dorms co-ed. The adjustments were difficult but the renovations, especially those completed in Alumni Hall, one of the oldest dorms on campus, were appreciated by all. Women also experienced the housing lottery for the first time that fall. The renovations across campus allowed for the possibility of more women to be accepted at Holy Cross. Thus, the College began an advertising campaign that showed Holy Cross as a co-educational school.
This promotinal video, which aired in 1974, presented potential students with a picture of an integrated campus open to accepting everyone. Women attend classes, study, and enjoy life on campus beside their male counterparts. The creators were especially careful to cast black women and men, and interacial pairings are seen throughout the video. While the reality was not quite so picture-perfect, progress was being made towards bringing more diversity to the campus.
.
Image from "A Day for Women" flyer, March 1974
Progress was made towards recognizing the accomplishments of women on campus in 1974. On March 1, 1974, the Women's Organization hosted its first major event, "A Day for Women." Despite their small budget, the weekend was deemed a success. The event, which had as its slogan "Women are Not Chicks,” featured dinners, lectures, workshops, and art exhibits celebrating women. The weekend drew large numbers from Worcester and Boston.
The College Choir Women's Chorus was also founded in 1974.
Joanne C. Ball holding her diploma after receiving it from Rev. John Brooks, S.J. at Commencement, May 1974, Crossroads, May/June 1974
On May 31, 1974, 17 pioneering women who had transferred to Holy Cross after their sophomore year at other schools became the first women to cross the Commencement stage. Joanne C. Ball was the first woman to receive a diploma from Holy Cross.
Sr. Anna Kane, S.S.J., Crusader, September 14, 1974
In September of 1974, two women members of the Holy Cross community became role models when they took on milestone positions.
Sr. Anna Kane, S.S.J., arrived on campus as a graduate student instructor in Chemistry in 1972, and earned her Masters degree in 1974. She was then appointed as the first woman chaplain at Holy Cross, a position she held until 1984. She also served as a part time Chemistry laboratory instructor. Sr. Kane was instrumental in the foundation of Abby’s House, a women’s shelter in Worcester. She set up the original college partnership with the organization in 1976, and encouraged Holy Cross students to volunteer, many of whom were members of the Women’s Organization. It's likely Sr. Anna was one of the first women to serve as a Catholic college chaplain.
Following her nine years at Holy Cross, Sr. Kane served in the Office of Ministerial Resources at Mont Marie in Holyoke, the Director of Family Life Volunteers, a Ministry of the Little Sisters of the Assumption in Worcester, and Chaplain and Bereavement Coordinator for Brookhaven Hospice in Framingham.
Dr. Ogretta McNeil, Circa 1971
Dr. Ogretta McNeil joined the Psychology department in 1969 as a visiting professor. In 1971, she became the first woman hired to a tenure track position and the first Black professor to serve on the faculty. In 1974, she earned tenure and was promoted to the rank of associate professor, becoming the first Black tenured professor. Later, she served as the Chair of the Psychology department and continued teaching psychology until her retirement in 1997. In addition to her work in the classroom, Professor McNeil was known as a champion for diversity on campus. In 1982, she was appointed as the black student advisor and in 1984, she was appointed assistant dean for academic services for ALANA (African-American, Latin American, Asian-American or Native American heritage) students.
Both women had a positive impact for women on campus as their positions provided female representation on a campus where the percentage of women to men was still quite low.
Joan Sinopoli, '76, Crusader, Novmber 15, 1974
1974 also saw women in leadership roles of student organizations. Joan Sinopoli, '76, was named the first woman editor-in-chief of the Crusader. This was also important given that the Crusader was about to celebrate its 50th year of publication. She is currently the head of Sinopoli marketing consulting LLC.
Women's Varsity Crew Team, 1974, 1974 Purple Patcher
That fall also saw the addition of women's varsity field hockey and crew. This brought the roster to four varsity women's teams: Women's basketball, tennis, field hockey, and crew. These sports were also allotted funds for essential expenditures such as uniforms, use of buses,and funds for lodging and food, as well as the salaries of four coaches. Thus women's athletics program prospects were looking up. But as Ann Cahill explained, this was largely due to the efforts of the women themselves.
Virtually every woman's team . . . came into existence because of the persistence and assertiveness of the women who were committted to the idea of a female athletic program. Lacking the most fundamental necessities, the teams were essentially put through a trial period. If they showed enough consistent effort for three or more years, they would then begin to receive some degree of institutional support. Those were . . . difficult years, and the wounds still smart. (Cahill p. 115)
Women's Varsity Fieldhockey Team Members (in solid skirts), 1974, 1974 Purple Patcher
In November 15, 1974, the Crusader ran a series of articles discussing the multiple viewpoints held about co-education. Most of those interviewed spoke of the social changes that occurred at Holy Cross during those first years. A member of the class of 1975 saw his as a "lost" class as they were caught between two traditions: all-male and co-ed. Others were more optimistic about the changes, and saw the merits of both systems. Many mentioned the shift in culture at Holy Cross, noting that the busloads of women from neighboring colleges wanting to attend weekend mixers at Holy Cross stopped coming. Women interviewees felt that there was a decrease in community as their numbers on campus rose.
The interviewees also mentioned that the rise in academic standards reduced the "work-play balance." This focus was likely spurred on by the competitive spirit that women adopted as they felt that they needed to prove themselves worthy of Holy Cross. However, many spoke of how the difficulties they experienced at the beginning began to smooth over as women's presence at Holy Cross became more accepted. Rosanne Oronato Anderson, class of 1976, stated, "Academically, there was a lot of competitiveness in my class. In the beginning, the women felt like they had to prove themselves. Now, there is a lot less of that- everyone tries to get their work done without trying to outdo each other. We've graduated to the stage where people are working for their own sake, rather than out of competition." (Crusader, November 15, 1975, p 10)
1975
Mary Hetu MacDonald, '76
1975 was named the International Year of Women by the United Nations. The Women's Organization continued to be an important unifying source for women on campus in 1975. One of their first tasks for the new year was to create a women's studies library in Hogan. It was co-founded by Kim McElaney, '76, and Marie Hetu MacDonald, '76. This library included pamphlets and books on women's health, literature, and history that were not already housed in Dinand Library. A cross-referenced list was created by Kim McElaney that gathered the holdings of area colleges as well as Dinand Library for these subjects into one resource.
Katherine "Kim" McElaney, '76
Hetu stated that the long-term goal of the Women's Organization was to "realize that we women are a power and, in so doing, hope to have more women incorporated into the faculty and administration at Holy Cross, and to have more successful role models. As a power I mean that women constitute a large number on campus, and so we need more influence on policies." (Crusader, January 31, 1975, p.6) Her words proved to be prophetic as Kim McElaney was named the first woman and first layperson to hold the position of Director of the Office of College Chaplains in 1992.
Women's Organization Women's Weekend Flyer March 8, 1975
The Women's Organization also hosted a successful Women's Weekend that spring. Titled "Genesis II," the weekend focused on the role of women in society. It took place on International Women's Day, March 8, 1975.
Martha Lang, First woman Commencement Speaker, 1975, Crossroads, May/June 1975
In keeping with the occasion of the International Women's Year, Mabel Lang, PhD, a professor of Greek at Bryn Mawr College, was chosen by Fr. Brooks to give the commencement address that year. She was the first woman commencement speaker.
Programming for the International Women's Year continued that Fall. The Women's Organization held workshops and lectures for the yearlong celebration. The Chaplains' Office also co-hosted a Women's Symposium with the local branch of the National Association of Women Religious.
Flyer from the Women's Symposium, October 1975
1975 Women's Varsity Volleyball Team, Crusader, September 26, 1975
Women's athletics experienced several gains during the Fall of 1975. The completion of the Hart Athletics Center in December of 1975 provided women with much needed practice and competition space for volleyball, basketball and gymnastics. In addition, women's volleyball gained varsity status that September.
1976: First Year of Four-year Co-educational Graduates
1976 marked the first year women graduates had spent all four years of their Holy Cross career on campus. It was a year of firsts.
Elizabeth Peiffer, '76, an economics/psychology double major, was named the first woman Fenwick Scholar. The Fenwick Scholar Program is the highest academic honor at Holy Cross. Her project “Levels of Self-actualization among Married Working Women Compared across the Sex-typing of Occupations“ examined whether women were more self-actualized serving in male-biased jobs versus female-biased jobs. Peiffer went on to careers in accounting and education.
This photograph appeared in the 1976 Purple Patcher.
Mary Ellen Phelen, '76 became the first Crusader of the Week in honor of her great performance on the basketball floor against Wesleyan in February of 1976. She went on teach English at Watchung Hills Regional High School. She is now the school's Director Of Curriculum And Instruction.
This article appeared in the February 6, 1976 Crusader.
The words of Holy Cross' Alma Mater were changed to be more inclusive. The lines that originally read, "Oh hear thy sons in happy songs Holy Cross, O Holy Cross. Thy sons are loyal, true and strong, Holy Cross, O Holy Cross" were changed to "Oh hear thy voice one in song Holy Cross, O Holy Cross. Thy spirits loyal, true and strong, Holy Cross, O Holy Cross."
The updated lyrics were printed in the 1976 Commencement brochure.
Jane Hawkins, '76, became the first woman to be named valedictorian at Holy Cross. She is also the first woman at Holy Cross to receive the Marshall Scholarship for graduate study in England. She is professor emeritus of mathematics at UNC Chapel Hill, where she has been a member of the faculty since 1987.
This photo appeared in the 1976 Purple Patcher yearbook.
The 1976 Commencement was filled with pomp and circumstance. Like the first Co-Ed Day nine years before, news cameras were drawn to Holy Cross to capture the events. The women had illustrious company as Mother Teresa, along with other honorary degree recipients, was honored for her charity work. While the day threatened rain, and morterboards blew from several heads during the processional, the downpour mercifully held off until the end of commencement.
Graduates processing during 1976 Commencement
Jane Hawkin's Valedictory Speech
Holy Cross, like many small liberal arts colleges across the nation, is slow to change. Even fads take longer to catch on at a school such as ours. For example, streaking hit the nation during the spring of 1973, but the idea did not reach Holy Cross until the early winter months of 1974. In keeping with our competitive spirit however, during the first week of March there were over 500 loyal Crusaders streaking our campus, (although some were forced to wear hats and scarves).
Coeducation at Holy Cross was also a belated event. After 123 years as an all-male institution, Holy Cross started to move toward integration of the sexes in 1967 by holding a Coeducation Day. This, I presume, was to insure that men could learn while sitting in the same classroom as women, and that women would be able to contribute to a learning atmosphere. Two years later Coeducation Week followed, and proving successful, eventually led to the official enrollment of women students at Holy Cross in 1972.
Has progress in the domain of academics been as delayed? When today's graduates were born in 1954, Holy Cross was offering its students a quality liberal arts education. Today we have just received the same. Does that mean that we are even farther behind in academics than in streaking? And if so, how can we dare to continue calling this medieval mode of education liberal?
Dr. Charles Frankel, the noted philosopher at Columbia University, a staunch defender of the liberal arts, recognizes what he calls the four great indictments against the liberal arts. First, Dr. Frankel says, the liberal arts reflect a myth of man's independent rational mind, the myth that it's in the use of his mind that his true happiness and highest virtue consists. Second, the liberal arts, he continues, are authoritarian because they are imposed on students. Third, they are useless. Fourth, and probably worst of all, they are elitist. Dr. Frankel quips: '' ... it ought to be plain that the liberal arts are as anachronistic in the year 1976 as corsets. Indeed, they share similar origins, and have about the same functions--to stifle and conceal."
Yet I believe a Darwinian philosophy prevails which says that whatever kind of education survives must be the best. And here we are in 1976, the liberal arts are still thriving, and we are still choosing to study them. I believe that Dr. Frankel's explanation of this phenomenon was correct. We continue to study and support the liberal arts because not only are they fascinating fields, but they do indeed liberate our minds. The liberal arts provide us with a necessary skill for facing the future - a skill more necessary today than ever - the ability to transcend present circumstances to approach problems in a productive way.
We are part of a generation that had no major causes to fight during our college years. Many have called us apathetic. Yet ours is a generation which had been nurtured on turmoil, scientific advancement, and violence before our arrival on college campuses. Our parents and teachers have experienced all the traumas of the past two decades with us, but the difference lies in our perspectives.
From the year that we, the graduates of 1976, were born until our freshman year of college, the United States was engaged in almost uninterrupted combat. War did not shock us, but peace was a new concept with which we had to learn to live.
We were three years old when Sputnik was launched, triggering a world-wide technological revolution. We were too young to notice; but via the omnipresent and omnipotent television, we were able to witness space flight after space flight until in July of 1969 we watched in awe as man walked on the moon. As high school students most of us realized that we were observing one of the greatest scientific achievements of all times, yet we were not surprised. Why should we have been surprised? Our years of development and learning had taken place during the decade of science and technology. Unfortunately, the constant emphasis on technological advancement during these vital years resulted in a void in our awareness of ethical commitment.
We were also bone-weary from violence. Who among us has forgotten November 22, 1963? For fourth graders it was a frightening and indelible experience to witness the tears shed by an entire nation over the loss of its beloved leader. But it was only the beginning of the brutality that would flash across our television screens and newspapers. Martin Luther King, Bobby Kennedy, Cambodia, The Population Explosion, The Energy Crisis, The Watergate Affair - these are all included in our childhood memories.
We had lived through so many crises and causes by the time we were college freshmen, that it was time to turn inward and spend time on the study of human values. Beyond their immediate concerns, what we learn from the humanities is that the human spirit is the fundamental fact of experience. The world that we regard as solid is merely a creation of the human spirit. The liberal arts give us an expressive means of objectifying the clash between the individual and the world which surrounds him. Poets and painters have been expressing their experiences directly for centuries, while even works of history, philosophy, and literature involve contemplation of the human experience.
The liberal arts offer not only a view of man's actions and thoughts of the past, but they demonstrate a manner of teaching and study. Through an analysis of universal man, a student is liberated from the pressures of time and place and self. He is forced to analyze, criticize, and question the human experience through internal means, rather than under the restrictions of today's guidelines or yesterday's rules. The ability to crystallize one's thoughts, form an opinion, and express oneself cogently is a skill that arises from a liberal arts training. And so, contrary to many critics' laments, a liberal arts education does not imply a thorough knowledge of several obscure subjects, but an approach to learning that is carried into every phase of our education - forcing us not to accept anything as final, but to weigh evidence, analyze, and question.
Any numbness and apathy that was beginning to permeate our existence when we entered college was stripped away by the liberal arts. It is a grueling and involving experience to pore through a volume for hour upon hour, trying to draw some thread of comprehension from the printed page, whether it be literature, math, or biology. Then to interpret and take a stand on the material presented exhausts the student even more. Yet most demanding is moving this critical and questioning approach out of the libraries and into our lives. The internal conflicts that have arisen on this and other campuses reveal that we are able to live the liberal arts tradition. We challenge each other, we disagree among ourselves, we demand emphasis on human - not only economic value.
As we leave Holy Cross College today,we are leaving behind many close friends - Jesuits, lay faculty, and students. However we are bringing with us an invaluable heritage from our four years here -a liberal arts education, an attitude that will help us to confront and overcome the problems we will encounter in the future. Let us not be discouraged but optimistic about the world that is awaiting us at the bottom of College Hill.
Let us pray for courage. Let us pray for the patience to bear in mind that there are two tests of a good education. One is what we do with it in the marketplace, what it contributes to our role as a citizen, as a person living in a social world of other persons. The other is what we do with it in our solitariness, how reliable it is when we are alone. When we have no company to fall back on except our own.
We have received an education that prepares us not only to live in the world but to live with ourselves.
Epilogue
The women who stepped onto Mount St. James during the formative years of co-education paved the way for those who came after. Their bravery, integrity, resilience, and dedication helped shape today's Holy Cross. Their efforts brought about many of the organizations and athletics teams that still flourish and they served as models for future generations. When looking for a closing remark for this exhibit chronicling the experiences of women at Holy Cross from 1972-1976, we found this quote from Maureen Dillon Grulich, '76, taken from her interview for Cahill's book. We would certainly agree that they were a special group who helped bring about a new era at Holy Cross.
[I wanted to leave behind] a place where, if a woman is bright, and articulate, she can stand next to any man; where someone is judged not on whether they're male or female, or good-looking or not, or whatever, just the fact that they can succeed. I think we did that. We were a special group that came through, those first couple of years . . . When I look back on it, it was a very vibrant group of females. Lots of leaders in that crowd. (Cahill, 38)
Maureen Dillon Greulich, '76
For more reflections on co-education at Holy Cross from 1972 to 1992 please read Ann J. Cahill's Women on the Hill: Alumnae Reflect on Twenty Years at Holy Cross, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA, 1993.
For more milestones in the history of co-education at Holy Cross please visit our timeline .
In addition, pleas
We hope you enjoyed this exhibit. We welcome your comments.