The Geology of the San Rafael Swell, Utah

Final Report for Field Experiences: Utah (GEOS 220)


Abstract

Utah is home to beautiful landscapes and open expanses, creating popular vacation destinations and areas of research. The state has five national parks, the third-most in any state in the United States, including Arches, Bryce Canyon, Canyonlands, Capitol Reef, and Zion National Parks. But the beauty of these parks stem from the nature of the landscape, including the exposed rocks and underlying geology that helped create the landforms. Changing depositional environments, water levels, and erosional patterns helped form these geologic units, as well as the collision and movement of continental and oceanic crusts, active from over 500 million years ago to the present day. This report aims to explore the tectonic history of this region and further investigate the nature of the geologic units present, by utilizing descriptions of the rocks in both hand sample and outcrop, the nature of where these rocks outcrop (based on a geologic map) and finally, how the units are situated in the subsurface (based on a cross section).


Introduction

In Spring of 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic struck, forcing schools and businesses to shut down, and classrooms to move online. DePauw University was one of these colleges that had to shut down its campus, causing most students to move back home and attend classes virtually. For the GEOS 220 course, Field Experiences: Utah, the course originally allowed for students to visit the San Rafael Swell in southeastern Utah. In Utah, strike and dip data, field observations, and geological interpretations would be recorded, and students would then create a geologic map, cross section, and stratigraphic column, before finally using this information to compile a report on Utah's geology. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, this trip was cancelled. However, data collected during previous teachings of this course have allowed the same projects to be created, and this Story Map serves as a way to showcase those data and projects as a virtual report.


Tectonic History

Precambrian Era - Paleozoic Era

Although most of the geologic units crucial to the landscapes visible in Utah today occurred much later, the first formations were created in the Precambrian Era (4600 - 541 Ma). As the North American continent was forming, collisions of continental crust caused the formation of granite and metamorphic rocks. These crystalline rocks form the Precambrian basement in the subsurface of southern Utah. After a period of erosion and non-deposition, represented now by a nonconformity, sedimentary rocks were deposited above this basement, formed during the Paleozoic Era (543 - 248 Ma). During this time, the western portion of the state was covered by a shallow sea, with quartz sand beaches to the east (Fig. 1, Utah Geological Survey).

Permian Period

The beaches and coastal environments in Utah were also present into the Permian Period (298 - 251 Ma), lithifying to form the quartz-rich White Rim Sandstone of the Cutler Group in the southwestern section of the state. Further to the east, slower moving waters and swampy environments created the other prominent member of the Cutler, the Organ Rock Shale. These members of the Cutler Group were eroded, however, creating a disconformity. Sea level began to rise towards the end of the Permian Period, and with the deeper waters brought by the transgression, the Kaibab Limestone was formed, observed today to contain shallow marine fossils. Around 251 m.y., at the end of the Permian, a gap in time is preserved in the rock record by the TR-1 Unconformity (Anderson et al., 2010).

During the Permian Period, North America began changing tectonically as well. As Pangea grew, the tectonic plates containing present-day South America and Africa collided with the eastern coast of North America, causing strain on the continental crust that spread across the nation. In this mountain-building event, which created the Appalachian Mountains on the eastern margin, crust in the western United States was stretched and pulled apart, causing previously-formed reverse faults to reactivate into normal faults to cause the Uncompahgre Uplift.

Triassic Period

The continental sea in the Permian Period began receding during the Lower to Middle Triassic Period (251 - 241 Ma), causing more fluvial environments to develop. River sands, silts, muds, and chert-rich conglomerates compacted to form units such as the Moenkopi Formation and Chinle Formation, the latter of which includes the Shinarump Conglomerate. This conglomerate formed from the higher rates of erosion off the uplifted areas of the Uncompahgre Uplift in eastern Utah, as well as a volcanic arc on the western coast of the United States that was created by an oceanic crust subducting beneath the North American plate. The Chinle Formation is bound on both contacts by disconformities, the TR-3 and J-0/TR-5 Unconformities. The TR-3 Unconformity is estimated to have occurred around 245 - 255 m.y., while the J-0 or TR-5 Unconformity formed around 215 m.y. (Anderson et al., 2010).

Jurassic Period

Sea levels continued to regress as the Triassic Period ended and the Jurassic Period began around 201 million years ago. Eroded rocks from northern Utah created sediments transported by older fluvial systems, causing an abundance of quartz-rich sands. But, as the shoreline of the continental sea of the Permian grew further from the coast, the depositional environment of these sands transitioned from a beach or fluvial setting to an eolian setting. Winds created large sands dunes and thick layers of fine, frosted grains, which would later lithify to form the Wingate Sandstone, famous for its tall cliffs coated with desert varnish, the Kayenta Formation, and the Navajo Sandstone. Around 185 - 171 million yeras ago, some of these eolian beds were eroded, creating the J-1 Unconformity. Sea level continued to fluctuate throughout the Jurassic Period, creating more geologic units exposed in Utah's national parks today, including the Carmel Formation, Entrada Sandstone, Curtis Formation, Summersville Formation, and Morrison Formation. The Morrison Formation is bound by the J-5 Unconformity (157 - 155 Ma) and K-0 Unconformity (145 - 98 Ma) (Anderson et al., 2010).

The volcanic arc that formed around the Permian Period continued through the Jurassic Period as the North American plate is being collided and translated. At this time, present-day Utah was located between the Nevada orogenic belt to the west and the Ancestral Rock Mountains and Uncompahgre Highlands to the east. Towards the end of the Jurassic Period, sea level began to rise yet again, filling in the lower lying areas in central Utah, creating the Sundance Seaway (Fillmore, 2000). Figure 2 (right) shows what the topography would have looked like at this time, both in map view and cross-sectional view.

Cretaceous Period

The Cretaceous Period (145.5 - 66 Ma) is primarily known for the Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway, a continental ocean that formed across the middle of North America. The Sevier Orogeny (140 Ma), a mountain-building even that uplifted land on the west coast, helped to create a boundary for this seaway, whose eastern coast was marked by the older uplifted land left from Pangea collisions. With this influx of water and increase of eroded highlands to the west, the depositional environment for Utah was altered, allowing the Cedar Mountain Formation, Dakota Sandstone, and Mancos Shale to form. To the right, Figure 3 reveals a map view and cross-sectional view of the topography at this time.

Tertiary Period - Present

Towards the end of the Cretaceous Period, around 80 million years ago, a second major mountain-building event started taking place, a tectonic event that would last for approximately 50 million years, into the Tertiary Period (65 - 2.59 Ma). During this event, known as the Laramide Orogeny, the North American plate continued to push westward, causing the oceanic plate along the west coast to subduct beneath the denser continental crust. This subduction had caused the Triassic volcanic arc, but a change in the course of the subducted plate marks the Laramide Orogeny. At this time, the oceanic plate subducting beneath the North American plate began to subduct at a much shallower pitch, allowing the tectonic event to speed up and create strain on rocks further inland and to the east than previously affected. The normal faults on the east coast were reactivated as reverse faults when the strain on these rocks forced movement of the crust. Reverse faults in the crystalline subsurface bent and flexed the sedimentary rocks draped above, forming monocline folds still visible in Utah today in the Colorado Plateau. One of these monoclines, in southeastern Utah, is referred to as the San Rafael Swell.

Further evidence for this shallowing of the subducted oceanic crust appears in basaltic volcanics along southern Utah and the southeastern corner of Nevada. Volcanics on the surface reveal a path from the west in towards the east, before returning to the west. This path shows how the shallowing of the subducted plate brought volcanics further inland, but as they retreated back to the west, this tectonic plate therefore steepened. A hot spot under the crust heated up this subducting plate, and the rising magma periodically melted its way through the surface. As time progressed, the series of volcanic activity left a trail, showing the path of the North American plate as it moved westward across the hot spot. The volcanics have been dated to 15 - 13 Ma, 11 - 9 Ma, 7 - 5 Ma, and 5 - 3 Ma (Fillmore, 2000). A map view and cross-sectional view of the present-day topography in the San Rafael Swell region are pictured to the right in Figure 4.


Geologic Units Present

Figure 5. Stratigraphic column for the geologic units present in the San Rafael Swell and Moab regions in southeastern Utah.

In southeastern Utah, the geologic units present in the San Rafael Swell and Moab areas provide evidence for the changing environments millions of years ago that formed the state's landscape visible today. Many of these units are exposed at National Parks such as Capitol Reef, Arches, and Canyonlands. The geology of the area includes a crystalline basement and Paleozoic rocks and evaporites that underlie the primary units: the Cutler, Kaibab, Moenkopi, Chinle, Wingate, Kayenta, Navajo, Carmel, Entrada, Curtis, Summersville, Morrison, Cedar Mountain, Dakota, and Mancos Formations. These units can be seen, along with ages and notable features, on the stratigraphic column of the area in Figure 5. The geology of this area shows changes of depositional history such as igneous and tectonic uplift activity, and environments of marine, fluvial, coastal, floodplain, alluvial, or eolian settings.

Identifying Features of Geologic Units

Precambrian Basement and Undifferentiated Paleozoic Rocks

The lowest geologic unit present in the San Rafael Swell and Moab areas in Utah dates to the Precambrian (4600 - 541 Ma). These crystalline units are classified together generally as the basement. According to Morris et al. (2010), these basement rocks were uplifted almost 7,000 feet above the surface along a fault trending NE-SW. With these rocks being uplifted so greatly, erosion occurs more steadily and rapidly than before, creating sediments that would accumulate into sedimentary rocks during the Paleozoic (358 - 251 Ma). These undifferentiated Paleozoic rocks can be seen today in outcrop directly above the crystalline basement, marked by a nonconformity. The depositional environments of these units represent marine, desert, coastal plain, alluvial, and fluvial settings (Anderson et al., 2010). However, one of the most prominent members in this area of Utah is the Paradox Formation, which contains evaporites, providing evidence that although there were water-rich environments, there were also drier periods without water.

Cutler Group

The Cutler Group includes two primary geologic units in the field area, the Organ Rock Shale and the White Rim Sandstone, both dating to the Permian Period (298 - 251 Ma). The reddish-brown Organ Rock Shale is from the Uncompahgre Uplift to the east, and is extremely arkosic. This unit was deposited in a swampy, slow-moving hydrous environment, where fine-grained sediments accumulated and were compacted over time. The quartz-rich White Rim Sandstone comes from the west, and represents a coastal dune or beach depositional environment. This sandstone layer includes large cross-beds, with individual beds reaching 5 - 75 feet in thickness (Morris et al., 2010). In areas such as Canyonlands National Park and Dead Horse Point State Park, the Organ Rock Shale and White Rim Sandstone of the Cutler Group are seen together in outcrop, in an interfingered "candy-striped" pattern.

Kaibab Formation

The Kaibab Formation includes a limestone that is pale yellow-white when dry and yellow-tan in hand sample. There is a range in color for the crystals, from clear and colorless to white and opaque quartz. These grains are subangular, medium- to fine-grained, and well-cemented in their matrix. With the addition of dilute HCl, the hand sample effervesces. Upon microscopic inspection, the grains themselves do not appear to react with the acid, but rather the cement in the matrix is effervescing. This reaction to dilute acid indicates the quartz grains are likely held together by a matrix composed of calcite. Overall, the Kaibab Formation hand sample is a moderately sorted rock. No distinct bedding or sedimentary structures are present (Fig. 6).

Figure 6. Example of the Kaibab Formation in hand sample.

As the Kaibab Formation is a limestone, the depositional environment of this unit was likely a shallow marine environment. The fine grains are sorted moderately well, so there may have been enough movement of water to bring in the occasional larger grain, but overall the current was consistent enough that grains were sorted well. This unit dates to the Early Permian (around 270 Ma), and is known for having fossils from organisms that lived in shallow Permian seas (National Park Service, 2015).

Moenkopi Formation

In hand sample, the Moenkopi Formation has very fine grains, which are rounded and very well sorted. These grains are well cemented by a matrix likely made of calcite or carbonate, as it effervesces with dilute HCl. The sample is either a very fine-grained sandstone or siltstone. The sample is an orange-tan when dry, and a darker caramel-brown when wet. Macroscopically, the hand sample shows evidence of trough cross-laminations (Fig. 7).

Figure 7. Examples of the Moenkopi Formation in hand sample.

The trough cross-beds in the Moenkopi Formation indicate a depositional environment of a water current, like a stream or river. The Moenkopi Formation is associated with the Lower to early Middle Triassic (about 251 - 241 Ma), and the formation includes a sandstone, siltstone, mudstone, and chert-rich conglomerate (Huntoon et al., 2010). The sorting, sphericity, and size of the grains also imply weathering or transportation over great distances, which further supports this idea of fluvial and shallow marine environments.

Chinle Formation

The Chinle Formation primarily appears in three variations of colors and textures. The first of these is a rusty - dark rust-brown mudstone, with a slightly gritty texture and very fine grains. The mudstone is very well sorted with subrounded grains, where the grains are contained in lenticular beds. With the addition of dilute HCl, the hand sample effervesces between the lenticular beds, as well as in thin beds that are lighter in color than the rest of the sample. The Chinle Formation can also be a lighter, rose-brown, poorly sorted sandstone. This sandstone contains both clear, colorless, subrounded quartz grains, as well as white, opaque, subangular grains of feldspar or lithics. With the possibility of quartz, feldspars, and lithics present, the sample is likely a lithic arenite. The cement holding these grains together effervesces in dilute HCl, indicating a cement of calcite. The third and final hand sample of the Chinle includes a tan, very fine-grained sandstone. This sample has lenticular beds that nearly resemble herringbone cross-stratification, in which the grains are well sorted and subangular. Overall, the sample is fissile, fizzes in HCl, and is micaceous. All three hand samples are visible in Figure 8.

Figure 8. Examples of the Chinle Formation in hand sample.

The Chinle Formation dates to the Upper Triassic, around 237 - 201 m.y. (Huntoon et al., 2010). With sandstones and mudstones present, the Formation likely formed in a fluvial environment. Although not seen in hand sample, the Chinle Formation also contains the Shinarump Conglomerate, which contains pebbles of quartz and chert that were deposited in a fluvial environment (Huntoon et al., 2010). As there is quite a bit of variety in terms of grain size present in the Chinle, the depositional environment most likely was fluvial throughout, but changed slightly across the landscape, with slower waters allowing a mudstone to form, to the fastest waters creating the Shunarump Conglomerate.

Wingate Sandstone

In hand sample, the Wingate Sandstone is quartz-rich with planar beds. A fresh surface of the Wingate is a pink-tan when dry, and darkens slightly to a more peachy when wet. When a surface of the sandstone has been exposed and subjected to weathering, an FeMn oxide forms a darker coating known as desert varnish. The addition of dilute HCl to a sample of the Wingate does not cause any visible reaction, indicating the quartz grains are cemented together with a siliceous material rather than calcareous. The quartz grains themselves are fine grained, rounded, and very well sorted. The Wingate Sandstone seems to be moderately cemented, as some of the grains break apart but in general the hand sample tends to stay mostly intact. Examples of the Wingate Sandstone in hand sample are pictured in Figure 9.

Figure 9. Examples of the Wingate Sandstone in hand sample.

The Wingate Sandstone is noticeable in the field by its large, vertical cliffs, often covered with desert varnish. These cliffs are often quite thick, measuring approximately 230 - 350 feet from the top to the bottom of the cliff (Doelling et al., 2010). With such a thick sandstone bed, a long depositional period is represented, dating to the Jurassic Period (201 - 145 Ma). The depositional environment for the Wingate Sandstone is believed to have been eolian and sabkha (coastal flat) environments, with large wind-blown sand dunes creating thick cross-beds of rounded, fine-grained sands (Doelling et al., 2010). With wind-blown sands, it is common to see frosted grains, although these were not noticeable in the hand samples present.

Kayenta Formation

The Kayenta Formation is primarily known for its rose-brown sandstone. In hand sample, this sandstone has fine, well-sorted grains that are subrounded to subangular, forming planar laminations. With the addition of dilute HCl, some bubbles escape from the hand sample, although it was not determined if these bubbles were caused by an effervescing cement or simply air escaping from between pore spaces between grains. One of the hand samples, shown in Figure 10, includes rounded nodules of a darker material. These nodules are very fine grained and effervesce strongly with acid unlike the surrounding main body of the sample. This reaction could potentially indicate a calcite-cemented sandstone or possibly even fragments of a limestone.

Figure 10. Examples of the Kayenta Formation in hand sample.

The sediment grains that have formed the Kayenta Formation were likely not transported long distances, as they were not well rounded. However, the grains are well sorted, so the depositional environment could have been along a beach or near the coast, where waves would sort, weather, and rework the grains. The darker nodules present in hand sample could also indicate a fluvial or beach setting, where limestone could be formed, or possibly of calcite-cemented sands were dropped into the main sandstone. In general, the Kayenta Formation dates to the Jurassic Period, approximately 201 - 145 m.y.

Navajo Sandstone

The Navajo Sandstone is a quartz arenite, whose hand samples are white-gray when dry and a darker tan-gray when wet. With the addition of dilute HCl acid, neither the grains nor cement in the sandstone effervesce, indicating the absence of calcite. When macroscopically viewing the hands sample (Fig. 11), faint planar beds can be identified. Microscopically, the individual quartz grains can be seen. They are very well sorted, rounded, and many of the grains are frosted as well, with a slight etched, opaque look.

Figure 11. Examples of the Navajo Sandstone in hand sample.

Dating to the Jurassic Period, around 185 m.y., the depositional environment of the Navajo Sandstone is commonly accepted as being an eolian setting. The Navajo Sandstone can be identified easily in outcrop, forming thick, white cliffs that can be over 1,000 feet thick (Doelling et al., 2010). The frosting, shape, and sorting of the quartz grains are all evidence to an environment of wind-blown sands that would have undergone significant weathering and transportation. Although planar beds are visible in hand sample, outcrops of the Navajo Sandstone can show the large cross-beds associated with wind-blown sand dunes, sometimes reaching as thick as 35 feet (Doelling et al., 2010).

Carmel Formation

In hand sample, the Carmel Formation shows a tan-gray limestone in sharp contact with large white crystals, between which lies a thin rust-orange coating. The grains of the sample are best viewed microscopically, as they are very fine grained. Well cemented together, these grains are sub-rounded, well sorted, and effervesce with dilute HCl. On the sides of the hand sample, dark manganese dendrites appear, showing surfaces that broke apart at slight fissures or cracks where Mn-rich water had once seeped. The hand samples observed for the Carmel Formation are shown in Figure 12.

Figure 12. Examples of the Carmel Formation in hand sample.

Across Utah, the Carmel Formation contains sandstone, siltstone, mudstone, limestone, and gypsum layers, together ranging from 200 to 1,000 feet thick (Morris et al., 2010). Two notable units of the Carmel Formation in this area include the Page Sandstone and the Dewey Bridge Member. However, the hand samples provided were fine grained, had calcite crystals, dendrites, and fizzed with HCl, all indicating the sample is a limestone. Limestones form in a shallow marine environment, and may contain fossils. Despite the variety of rock types present in the Carmel Formation, each represents a hydrated environment, whether that be a shallow sea, fluvial system, or tidal area. The Carmel Foramtion was formed during the Jurassic Period, around 166 - 168 m.y.

Entrada Sandstone

Hand samples of the Entrada Sandstone have round, very well sorted, very fine grains that are poorly cemented together. With the addition of dilute HCl acid, no visible reaction occurred, indicating the absence of a calcite cement. Although they have similar textures, there were three samples of the Entrada, each of which a slightly different color. The three samples, seen in Figure 13, range from red-brown, a lighter pink-brown, and a tan. The grains of the Entrada Sandstone form planar beds.

Figure 13. Examples of the Entrada Sandstone in hand sample.

The Entrada Sandstone can reach thicknesses of 400 to 900 feet in outcrop, creating notable landforms such as arches at Arches National Park or monoliths at Capitol Reef National Park (Morris et al., 2010). Also dating to the Jurassic Period, the Entrada Sandstone was likely deposited around 158 m.y. in eolian or tidal flat environments. One of the most prominent units of the Entrada in the San Rafael Swell and Moab areas of Utah is the Slickrock Member, which is the specific unit that comprises the arches of Arches National Park.

Curtis Formation

The Curtis Formation contains two primary types of grains in hand sample. There are clear, colorless, rounded grains of quartz, and white-yellow, opaque, angular mineral grains (possibly feldspar). Overall, these grains are poorly sorted and are held together by a calcareous cement, as it reacts with dilute acid. As seen in Figure 14, the hand sample of the Curtis Formation is a light golden brown, but there are brighter white beds that protrude slightly. These veins are more resistant to weathering than the main body of the sandstone.

Figure 14. Example of the Curtis Formation in hand sample.

With the name of the Curtis Formation can arise some confusion, as the same unit has previously, and in other areas of Utah, been referred to as the Moab Tongue Member. Regardless of the name, the Curtis Formation is widely believed to have been formed in a Jurassic marine depositional environment (Morris et al., 2010). In outcrop, the Curtis Formation can also appear with a slight green tint, as the unit is glauconitic.

Summersville Formation

Above the Curtis Formation lies the Summersville Formation, the uppermost part of the San Rafael Group. This slope-forming unit dates to the Late Triassic - Early Jurassic, and is easy to identify in outcrop, as the Summersville is marked by the J-3 unconformity beneath it (Anderson et al., 2010). Alternating layers of siltstone and sandstone comprise this unit, with thin veins of evaporites like gypsum cross-cutting the planar beds, creating a red and white banded unit (Anderson et al., 2010). The Summersville Formation was likely deposited in a fluvial environment, with alternating periods of slight water level or current velocity changes.

Morrison Formation

The Morrison Formation creates thick cliffs in outcrop, bound by two unconformities - the J-5 and the K-0. These unconformities provide an age range of the unit of 155 - 148 m.y. during the Jurassic Period, and can also aid in identifying the unit in outcrop. The Morrison Formation consists of tan sandstones and red or gray-green shales that can reach thicknesses of over 700 feet (Anderson et al., 2010). Some important geologic members in this area contained in the Morrison Formation include the Brushy Basin, Salt Wash, and Tidwell Members. These members, as well as the other sandstones and shales of this unit, provide evidence of floodplain and overbank depositional environments (Anderson et al., 2010).

Cedar Mountain Formation and Dakota Sandstone

Atop the K-0 unconformity, which cuts into the top of the Morrison Formation, lie the Cedar Mountain Formation and Dakota Sandstone. The Cedar Mountain Formation is light to dark brown in outcrop and consists of mudstones with intervals of sandstones (Doelling, 2010). This unit can be seen in Arches National Park, Capitol Reef National Park, and the Grand Staircase National Monument. The Cedar Mountain Formation, along with the following unit of Dakota Sandstone, both date to the Cretaceous Period (145 - 66 Ma). The Dakota Sandstone contains multiple types of rock that can be as thick as 110 feet, including limestone, shale, and sandstone (Doelling, 2010). While the depositional environment of the Cedar Mountain Formation was likely a floodplain, the Dakota Sandstone was more of a coastal plain with lagoons (Doelling, 2010).

Mancos Shale

The final and uppermost geologic unit that is prevalent in our field area in Utah is the Mancos Shale. Overall, the Mancos Shale is approximately 2,300 - 3,700 feet thick, containing five primary members: the Tunuk Shale, Ferron Sandstone, Blue Gate Shale, Muley Canyon, and Masuk Members (Morris et al., 2010). These members of the Mancos Shale can be dated to the Cretaceous Period around 145 - 66 m.y.

The following geologic map and cross section were created to provide a better understanding of the units present in the San Rafael Swell of southeastern Utah. The units discussed above are featured here, with their map symbols identified in the legend.

Figure 15. Geologic map and cross section of the San Rafael Swell, Utah, featuring the rock units previously discussed.

References

Figure 5. Stratigraphic column for the geologic units present in the San Rafael Swell and Moab regions in southeastern Utah.

Figure 15. Geologic map and cross section of the San Rafael Swell, Utah, featuring the rock units previously discussed.

Figure 6. Example of the Kaibab Formation in hand sample.

Figure 7. Examples of the Moenkopi Formation in hand sample.

Figure 8. Examples of the Chinle Formation in hand sample.

Figure 9. Examples of the Wingate Sandstone in hand sample.

Figure 10. Examples of the Kayenta Formation in hand sample.

Figure 11. Examples of the Navajo Sandstone in hand sample.

Figure 12. Examples of the Carmel Formation in hand sample.

Figure 13. Examples of the Entrada Sandstone in hand sample.

Figure 14. Example of the Curtis Formation in hand sample.