San Mateo General Plan Survey

Help plan the future of San Mateo.

Three circulation and land use alternatives have been developed that could guide how the city will look, feel, and change over the next 20 years.

We are seeking your input, which growth scenario do you prefer?

Survey Instructions

The purpose of this survey is to solicit your feedback on which circulation and land use scenario should be included in the City's updated General Plan.

Project Context

The background section of this survey is intended to help you understand each alternative and why the City is planning for growth and change.

Circulation Alternatives

This section presents text, images, and maps describing the three circulation alternatives. 

Land Use Alternatives 

This section presents text, images, and maps describing the three land use alternatives. 

Survey

The second part of the survey includes the questions we would like your feedback on. The survey should take approximately 8 to 12 minutes.

If you are already familiar with the circulation and land use alternatives and would like to go right to the survey,  click here .

What is a General Plan?

A General Plan is often described as the “constitution” that guides the development of a city, typically for a 20-year horizon. It is the foundation on which all land use and regulatory decisions are made.

San Mateo is updating its General Plan, which will express the community’s  vision  for how the City will look, feel, and change over the next 20 years. The General Plan will include policies that determine what can and cannot be built in the City, including new homes, new businesses, and improvements to our streets and sidewalks, and how this development will be served.

As part of the General Plan Update, the City is proactively planning for how to meet the requirements of State housing law, identify solutions to traffic and housing affordability issues, and prepare for projected population and job growth in the region and locally. Topics that are not discussed in this survey will be covered very soon – before the final draft of the General Plan is prepared in 2023.

Why is the City planning for growth?

Although San Mateo is largely "built out," California law requires cities to plan for new housing that will accommodate a range of households and income levels.

Through the General Plan Update, the City is proactively planning how to meet State housing law requirements while ensuring that future growth is logical, orderly, and achieves the community’s vision of San Mateo as a place that is “vibrant, livable, diverse, and healthy.”

Each land use alternative shows a vision for the different types of development that should occur  over the next 20 years to accommodate State-mandated housing allocations. The circulation alternatives explore  different ways people can travel around the city and how to prioritize investment over the next 20 years.

Alternatives Evaluation

In order to help inform the selection process, the impacts and benefits of the three land use and circulation alternatives on the following topics were evaluated and compared:

  • Urban Form
  • Traffic and Multimodal Circulation
  • Community Services
  • Utilities
  • Environmental Sustainability
  • Equity and Public Health
  • Fiscal Sustainability
  • Market Feasibility
  • Community Benefits

Click the link below to view the full Report that was published in January 2022.

Circulation Alternatives

The City developed three alternatives to enhance circulation for bicycles, cars, transit riders, and pedestrians over the next 20 years. Each circulation alternative proposes a different way to meet the anticipated future transportation needs of San Mateo; and each could be tailored to integrate with and support the preferred land use scenario. 

Click the links below to view the three circulation alternatives maps and the circulation image.

Circulation Alternative A

This alternative aims to create walkable communities throughout San Mateo by prioritizing improvements along pedestrian corridors and at challenging intersections, and implementing traffic calming and safety improvements near highway on-ramps.

Alternative A results in the second highest amount of pedestrian improvements when compared to the other alternatives.

Alternative A includes more bicycle improvements than Alternative B. 

Alternative A performs the lowest in terms of transit because it does not include east-west transit connections.

Circulation Alternative B

This alternative aims to increase and improve transit access to and from major connections in San Mateo by adding transit connections from Study Areas 3, 6, and 10 to the Hillsdale Caltrain station, prioritizing dedicated carpool (HOV) and bus lanes, and adding Bus Rapid Transit improvements to El Camino Real.

Alternative B includes the lowest amount of pedestrian improvements.

All alternatives include good bicycle network coverage, but because Alternative B does not include bicycle improvements along El Camino Real it scored the lowest in this category.

Alternatives B and C would have the highest transit benefit.

Circulation Alternative C

This alternative combines the local and regional transportation improvements of Alternatives A and B. It adds innovative urban design downtown, inspired by Barcelona’s “superblocks,” that allows vehicle access at the periphery and limits cut-through vehicles to create a pedestrian focused downtown. In addition, this alternative would explore concepts such as an automated micro-transit circulator (such as an Autonomous Vehicle shuttle) or a locally focused rideshare program (similar to the Via-Cupertino Shuttle) within City limits. 

Alternative C has the highest multi-modal benefit because it anticipates the most pedestrian, bicycle, and transit improvements. 

The public realm improvements and Downtown superblock in Alternative C would result in the most pedestrian benefits.

Click the links below to view the three circulation alternatives maps and the circulation image.

Land Use Alternatives

Each land use alternative shows a vision for the different types of development that could occur over the next 20 years. The alternatives explore three different approaches to plan for future housing, jobs, and commercial areas within specific areas of the city (Study Areas).

Click the links below to help get oriented on where the study areas are located, view the land use alternatives maps, view the land use image, and view a description of each land use type.

Land Use Alternative A

Alternative A generally plans for the least change in land use designations and the lowest growth. 

Alternative A would result in the least amount of population growth and have lower densities and heights. 

Due to the lower densities, Alternative A would likely not be able to meet future State-mandated housing targets beyond 2031, would result in fewer residents living in close proximity to transit and less new publicly accessible open space. 

All alternatives have the potential to impact historic resources, but Alternative A would propose the fewest changes to the Downtown historic district.

Land Use Alternative B

Alternative B plans for moderate population growth and spreads growth and midrange heights more evenly across all Study Areas in the city.

Alternative B would likely be able to fulfill future State-mandated housing targets, but would have a smaller housing buffer compared to Alternative C. 

Alternative B could result in the most changes to the Downtown historic district.

Alternative B includes the most medium density land use designations and would have the highest market feasibility.

Land Use Alternative C

Alternative C plans for the highest residential growth and concentrates growth, change, tallest heights, and density near transit in Downtown and the Bel Mateo / Mollie Stone Study Area.

Alternative C would generate the greatest residential growth and have the highest heights and densities. 

Since Alternative C has the greatest residential growth, it would likely be able to fulfill future State-mandated housing targets including a sufficient housing buffer.

Higher densities around San Mateo’s Caltrain stations and high frequency bus stops, would likely increase transit ridership, resulting in the lowest per capita Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) of the three alternatives. However, total VMT is highest under Alternative C because it has the highest increase in both residents and workers. 

Click the links below to help get oriented on where the study areas are located, view the land use alternatives maps, view the land use image, and view a description of each land use type.

What have we heard from the community?

The circulation and land use alternatives were developed through an extensive public review process. Some consistent themes have emerged in the community feedback.

Many people in San Mateo are very concerned about traffic congestion and safety on roadways, the lack of affordable housing, the need for transit and pedestrian improvements, and being able to find convenient parking. Many people have also noted the importance of community events, activities, and parks to help create a vibrant community life in San Mateo. The three circulation and land use alternatives reflect a range of different possible ideas to respond to these issues.

We want to hear from you. Which alternatives, or ideas from the alternatives, should become part of the General Plan?

Please scroll down to view survey. If you are using your phone, please click the survey link below.

Survey

Preferred Scenario Circulation