Exploring the San Rafael Swell, UT

DePauw University, Department of Geoscience, Geologic Field Experiences: Utah

Figure 1: Gigapan view of the eastside of the San Rafael Swell in Utah where I-70 cuts through it (Schott, 2009).

Abstract

The San Rafael Swell (SRS) is a large monocline approximately 50 km long and 120 km wide and is in south-central Utah, just northeast of Capitol Reef National Park (Jeffery, 2011). The SRS region is an exemplary location for learning how to identify stratigraphic units because it exposes rocks from the Permian White Rim Sandstone to the Cretaceous Blue Gate Shale. The mapped SRS region is marked by the latitude and longitude pairs (38.976310°, -110.514526°), (38.976310°, -110.308717°), (38.869096°, -110.514526°), and (38.869096°, -110.308717°). This area was mapped using Google Earth, and most of the units were identifiable based on outcrop pattern, cliff formations, and changes in color. When issues arose in mapping the region, such as with the Kaibab Formation and Entrada Sandstone, the main solution was to map the known surrounding units. For example, the Kaibab Formation issue was resolved by searching for the overlying and cliff-forming Moenkopi Formation instead of the gray Kaibab Formation itself.

The geologic history of the SRS is also excellent for learning how to understand what tectonic events and paleoenvironments lead to the formation of the SRS and its geologic units. By constructing a cross section of the SRS, the monocline was shown as east facing. Cross section apparent dips were calculated based on strike and dip data provided by M. S. Wilkerson. Research into the SRS region also indicates that basement-involved faulting from the Laramide Orogeny created structures such as the SRS. In all, the stratigraphic and geologic history of the SRS region aided in constructing the geologic map and cross section of the SRS (Fig. 2a; Fig. 2b). The resulting cross section, geologic map, and stratigraphic column were constructed using Adobe Illustrator.

Figure 2a: Geologic map of the San Rafael Swell in Utah.

Figure 2b: Cross section of the San Rafael Swell in Utah, with the cross section taken from A-A' marked on the geologic map above in Fig. 2a.

Introduction

Geologic Field Experiences: Utah is a Geoscience course offered by DePauw University that teaches students basic field skills by traveling to the area of study. For the Spring 2020 term, the class planned to investigate the San Rafael Swell (SRS) monocline and the Moab regions in south-central Utah (Fig. 3). The course plan was to have pre-trip lectures for establishing necessary geologic background, with post-trip goals of synthesizing and understanding the regions by creating geologic maps, cross sections, and reports. While the field trip was cancelled due to the outbreak of COVID-19, the class still achieved its goal, and students learned how to interpret the evolution of a field outcrop through geologic maps, cross sections, research, and lectures. The course was modified, however, to focus only on the San Rafael Swell monocline, for which the professor, M. S. Wilkerson, provided data. While students were unable to collect their own field data, the given strike and dip data allowed students to calculated apparent dip and learn how to construct geologic cross sections utilizing Google Earth and Adobe Illustrator. The overarching goal of learning geologic literacy was achieved through written reports and mapping projects, with this StoryMap as the course’s capstone project.

The San Rafael Swell is a part of the Colorado Plateau region, which extends across Arizona, Colorado, Utah, and New Mexico (Carstens, 2012; Fig. 3) Through uplift and erosion, the Colorado Plateau exposes rocks as old as the Precambrian in its canyons, making it an excellent region for geology enthusiasts to explore.

Figure 3: Map of Colorado Plateau which extends across Utah, Colorado, Arizona, and New Mexico (Carstens, 2012). Note that the SRS sites was added for reference. 

Geologic History and Stratigraphy of the San Rafael Swell 

From tropical marine oceans to large sand deserts, Utah’s geologic history is preserved in its rock and fossil records. Large-scale tectonic events, from subduction of the Farallon Plate to mountain-forming belts, helped create many of Utah’s famous geologic structures. In addition to describing the geologic and tectonic history of Utah, the stratigraphic units found at the SRS are also detailed in relation to their paleoenvironments. These rock descriptions helped in identifying units for the SRS geologic map and are summarized in a stratigraphic column (Fig. 4).

Figure 4: Stratigraphic column of the San Rafael Swell in Utah with notes on depositional environment and rock appearance.

Early Geologic History from the Precambrian Era (4543-541 Ma) up to the Permian Period (290Ma)

Permian Period (290-252 Ma)

Triassic Period (252-201 Ma)

Following Kaibab Formation in the Permian Period, a large mass extinction occurred between the Paleozoic and Mesozoic (250-65 Ma) Eras.

The Moenkopi Formation (Trm) is the first of the Triassic rocks at the SRS and includes the Black Dragon Member, Sinbad Limestone Member, Torrey Member, and Moody Canyon Member. This formation unconformably overlies the Kaibab Formation and is a fine-grained mudstone approximately 690-1000 ft thick (Morris et al., 2010).

Jurassic Period (201-145 Ma)

In the Jurassic Period, Utah drifted northward into the 10-30°N latitude region, which is known to form deserts (Morris et al., 2016). The Glen Canyon Group (Tr-J), which includes the Wingate Sandstone (Jw), Kayenta Formation (Jk), and Navajo Sandstone (Jn) members developed in this dry climate.

The continued convergence of the oceanic plate and western edge of the North American Plate created forebulge and backbulge basins, which resulted in occasional marine conditions reflected in the San Rafael Group rocks (Morris et al., 2016). The mid-Jurassic San Rafael Group unconformably overlies the Glen Canyon Group, and at the SRS, its members include the Page Sandstone (Jp), Carmel Formation (Jc), Entrada Sandstone (Je), Curtis Formation (Jcs), and Summerville Formation (Js) members.

Cretaceous Period (166-145 Ma)

Tertiary Period (66-2.6 Ma)

Figure 47: Laramide Orogeny diagram depicting a reverse fault in the basement rock and “draping” sediments above it, resulting in features such as the SRS (Morris et al., 2016).

The Tertiary Period is the first in the Cenozoic Era, and between the Cretaceous to Tertiary, approximately 80-30 Ma, the Laramide Orogeny occurred (Wilkerson, 2020). During this event, the Farallon Plate subducted more rapidly into the North American Plate (Morris et al., 2016). As the Farallon Plate subducted, it also began to shallow into the continental interior, which reactivated old Precambrian normal faults (Wilkerson, 2020). In this “thick-skinned” deformation style, basement-involved reverse faults are the result of compressive stress, and younger layers of sedimentary rock “drape” above the fault (Morris et al., 2016; Fig. 47).

Early Tertiary map of Utah highlighting normal faults and monoclines, such as the San Rafael Swell (circled in red) and Monument Uplift (Fillmore, 2000).

The uplifted rock results in structures such as the east-facing SRS monoline and the Water Pocket Fold (Fig. 48). During the Early Tertiary period, Utah had also moved north of the 10-30°N latitude region to a more temperate environment (Morris et al., 2016). 

Around 36 Ma in the Late Tertiary Period, the subduction of the Farallon Plate slowed until it eventually detached and the slab started to roll-back (Morris et al., 2016). This roll-back allowed magma to rise to the subsurface, which caused regional uplift and created volcanoes in southern Utah as part of the ignimbrite flareup (Morris et al., 2016). Large, intrusive granite and diorite laccoliths, such as Henry Mountains, also formed from this magma (Wilkerson, 2020). The regional uplift began entrenching the canyonlands as rivers were rejuvenated and began carving back down to sea level (Utah Geologic Survey, n.d). Basin and Range faulting also coincided with this regional uplift of the Colorado Plateau, which had an arid environment around 17 Ma (Morris et al., 2016).

Quaternary Period (2.6 Ma – Present) 

Following the Tertiary Period, an ice age occurred due to fluctuations in earth’s orbit associated with the Milankovitch cycles (Morris et al., 2016). In this ice age, the freshwater Lake Bonneville extended over northwest Utah, and this lake is the ancestor of the Great Salt Lake in Utah (Utah Geologic Survey, n.d). During the Early Quaternary, humans also appeared (Utah Geologic Survey, n.d). As the ice age thawed and Earth entered a warm period, Lake Bonneville began to evaporate and accumulate salt, and this lull between ice ages is the current warm phase that the Earth is in today (Morris et al., 2016). Currently, Utah still maintains its moderately arid environment and depositional patterns that it did when the Great Salt Lake formed.

Field Interpretation for the San Rafael Swell

Although the Field Experiences: Utah course was unable to collect data directly from the SRS, “field” data was still gathered utilizing Google Earth, lectures, and literature on the SRS. The SRS field area is bounded by the four corners: (38.976310°, -110.514526°), (38.976310°, -110.308717°), (38.869096°, -110.514526°), and (38.869096°, -110.308717°).

Constructing the SRS Geologic Map

Figure 2a: Geologic map of the San Rafael Swell in Utah.

The Geologic Map of the San Rafael Swell was constructed using Google Earth and Adobe Illustrator (Fig. 2a). By tracing the boundary for each unit in Google Earth, the contacts and satellite imagery was then transferred to Adobe Illustrator for coloring and annotation. These contacts were identified based on factors such as changes in color, outcrop pattern, and cliff facies, in which knowledge of each rock unit was gathered through lectures, hand samples, and literature to make informed decisions on the contacts.

Figure 49: White Rim Sandstone outcrop at the SRS traced in yellow. This unit was identified by its dendritic outcropping pattern and gray to tan color.

White Rim Sandstone and Kaibab Formation Contact

Wilkerson (2020) noted that the White Rim Sandstone (Pwr) of the Cutler Group is the oldest exposed rock at the SRS. This gray and tan sandstone was in the western portion of the site, where streams had cut into it. By locating these streams outlined in light gray, the White Rim Sandstone was traced, and it generally followed a dendritic outcrop pattern (Fig. 49).

Moenkopi Formation and Chinle Formation Contact

The contact between the Moenkopi Formation and younger Chinle Formation (Trc) relied on multiple cues because the white color indicative of the Chinle’s youngest member, the Shinarump Conglomerate, was not always present (Fig. 52).

Figure 52: Moenkopi Formation and Chinle Formation contact marked in gray. Note that the gray line follows the cliff in the flatiron shape. The white Shinarump Conglomerate Member marks the base of the Chinle Formation.

To map the Trm-Trc contact, the best method was to find and follow the cliff right underneath the White Shinarump Conglomerate (Fig. 52). While the Chinle Formation also contains beds that are slightly more red than the Moenkopi Formation, this was not as easily traced because both formations can take on a rusty-red color. Therefore, to ensure consistency, the cliff below the Shinarump Conglomerate was followed over color.

Wingate Sandstone and Kayenta Formation Contact

With the distinctive coloring of the Wingate Sandstone, the moment the tans and reds transitioned into light-gray, the boundary was marked. Additionally, the Kayenta Formation (Jk) has a "ledgey" appearance that helped separate the two units (Fig. 55). This contact also followed the overall flatiron pattern.

Figure 55: Wingate Sandstone to Kayenta Formation boundary in red, with the change in color and "ledgey" appearance of the Kayenta Formation differentiating the units.

Entrada Sandstone and Curtis Formation Contact

Similar to the Jc-Je contact, the Entrada Sandstone to Curtis Formation (Jct) contact relied on mapping the alluvium first to realize where it was cut off. The Curtis Formation is a marine, glauconite-bearing deposit, and while the green sheen of the glauconite could not be discerned on Google Earth, the gray hue to this formation helped distinguish it from the reddish-tan Entrada Sandstone (Fig. 59).

Figure 59: Entrada Sandstone to Curtis Formation contact marked in red. Note the contact also follows along a cliff.

Additionally, the the Curtis Formation is cliff-forming, in which the Je-Jct contact followed along a base of the gray Jct cliff outlined in red in Figure 59.

Curtis Formation and Summerville Formation Contact

Figure 60: Curtis Formation to Summerville Formation contact marked in orange. This contacts follows the transition from gray to reddish-brown.

The Summerville Formation (Js) is a reddish-brown siltstone that clearly differs from the gray Curtis Formation (Fig. 60). The stark change in color was consist throughout the mapped area, and is marked in orange on Google Earth (Fig. 60).

Figure 62: Morrison Formation and Cedar Mountain Formation contact marked in light blue as it follows the eroded surface between the units.

Morrison Formation and Cedar Mountain Formation Contact

The youngest member of the Morrison Formation is the Brushy Basin Member, which can vary from red, light purple, and tan, and also has a distinctive “popcorn” texture. The Cedar Mountain Formation (Kcm) then unconformably overlies the Morrison Formation, creating a sharp surface to follow at the base of the Cedar Mountain Formation (Fig. 62).

Although some of the Brushy Basin Member's light-red is exposed, talus and debris from the Cedar Mountain Formation has fallen onto it. Additionally, the Cedar Mountain Formation was also slightly red; therefore, in order to keep consistency, the eroded surface was followed over color.

Constructing the Cross Section

Table 1: Data provided by M. S. Wilkerson and data selected to calculate apparent dip .

After identifying and mapping the stratigraphic units at the SRS, a cross section from A-A' was constructed using strike and true dip data provided M. S. Wilkerson. Only data points close to the cross section were selected to calculate apparent dip (Table 1).

Topography for the cross section was taken from Google Earth and adjusted for vertical exaggeration. The rock contacts identified for the geologic map were used to created the stratigraphic layers, which were then dipped to their apparent dip (Fig. 2b). Morris et al. (2010) provided information on the fault, Precambrian Basement thickness, and Undifferentiated Paleozoic thickness added to the cross section. An additional scale bar marking sea level was included based on placing the SRS approximately 5000 ft above sea level (Hamel, 2015). Overall, a cross section for the SRS was created from the data provided by M. S. Wilkerson, Google Earth, and supporting literature on the SRS.

Figure 2a: Geologic map of the San Rafael Swell in Utah.

Figure 2b: Cross section of the San Rafael Swell in Utah, with the cross section taken from A-A' marked on the geologic map above in Fig. 2a.

Conclusion

Despite the outbreak of COVID-19, the San Rafael Swell in Utah was still investigated through the Geologic Field Experiences: Utah course offered by DePauw University. The stratigraphic and geologic history of the region explained how the Laramide Orogeny formed the east-facing San Rafael Swell Monocline in south-central Utah. By constructing a stratigraphic column, geologic map, and cross section of the San Rafael Swell, skills for describing rocks in the field were still developed and each unit was researched and scrutinized "in the field" through Google Earth.

REFERENCES CITED

Blakey, R., and National Park Service, 2015, Carmel Formation:  https://www.nps.gov/zion/learn/nature/carmel.htm . (Accessed May 2020).

Blakey, R., and National Park Service, 2015, Cedar Mountain Formation:

Blakey, R., and National Park Service, 2015, Navajo Sandstone:  https://www.nps.gov/zion/learn/nature/navajo.htm  (Accessed May 2020).

Carstens, H., 2012, The Colorado Plateau: A Geologist’s Paradise, GEOExPro, v. 9, p. 56.

Colorado Plateau Geosystems, 2016, Late Jurassic:  https://deeptimemaps.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/wislatejur1.png  (Accessed May 2020).

Cox, G and National Park Service, 2015, Sommerville Formation:  https://www.nps.gov/cany/learn/nature/sommerville.htm . (Accessed May 2020).

Fillmore, R., 2000, The Geology of the Parks, Monuments, and Wildlands of Southern Utah, University of Utah Press. p.24-127.

Fitzgerald, A and National Park Service,2015 , Kaibab Formation:  https://www.nps.gov/zion/learn/nature/kaibab.htm . (Accessed May 2020).

Fitzgerald, A and National Park Service, 2015, Kayenta Formation:  https://www.nps.gov/zion/learn/nature/kayenta.htm . (Accessed May 2020).

Fitzgerald, A and National Park Service, 2015, Moenkopi Formation:  https://www.nps.gov/zion/learn/nature/moenkopi.htm . (Accessed May 2020).

Hamel, L., 2015, The San Rafael Swell:  http://structuralgeologyof.weebly.com/contractional/the-san-rafael-swell-by-lorraine-hamel  (Accessed April, 2020).

Harshbarger, J. W., C. A. Repenning, and J. H. Irwin, 1957, Stratigraphy of the Uppermost Triassic and the Jurassic Rocks of the Navajo Country, U. S. Geological Survey Numbers Series 291. U.S. Department of Interior. p. 39-42

Hendrix, M. and J. Hendrix, 2007, Arches National Park Moab, Utah:  http://travellogs.us/2007Logs/Utah%202007/48-Arches%20NP%20-%20Moab/48aa%20Arches%20NP.htm . (Accessed: April 2020).

Herbert, N. and National Park Service, 2018, Arches:  https://www.nps.gov/arch/learn/nature/arches.htm . (Accessed May 2020).

Herbert, N. and National Park Service, 2015, Burro Canyon/Cedar Mountain Formation:  https://www.nps.gov/cany/learn/nature/burrocanyon.htm . (Accessed May 2020).

Herbert, N. and National Park Service, 2019, Wingate Sandstone:  https://www.nps.gov/cany/learn/nature/wingate.htm . (Accessed May 2020).

Jeffery, D. L., J. L. Bertog, and J. R. Bishop.,2011, Sequence Stratigraphy of Dinosaur Lake: Small Scale Fluvio-Deltaic Stratal Relationships of a Dinosaur Accumulation at the Aaron Scott Quarry, Morrison Formation, San Rafael Swell, Utah, Palaios V.26, p. 275-283.

Morris, T. H., Manning, V. W., and Ritter, S. M., 2010, Geology of Capitol Reef National Park, Utah, in Sprinkel, D. A., Chidsey, T. C. Jr., and Anderson, P. B., Geology of Utah’s Parks and Monuments, Utah Geological Association Publication 28, 3rd ed., p. 85-96.

Morris, T.H., Spiel, K.G., Cook, P.S., and Bonner, H.M, 2016, Landscapes of Utah’s Geologic Past: A Summary of Utah’s Fascinating Geologic History, BYU Press. p. 7-64.

National Park Service, 2020, Capitol Reef National Park:

National Park Service, 2015, Mancos Shale:  https://www.nps.gov/cany/learn/nature/mancosshale.htm . . (Accessed May 2020).

National Park Service, 2015, Mesa Verde Group:  https://www.nps.gov/cany/learn/nature/mesaverde.htm . Accessed May 2020).

National Park Service, 2015, Moenkopi Formation:

National Park Service, 2015, Chinle Formation:

Nuccio, V.F. and S. M. Condon, 1996, Burial and Thermal History of the Paradox Basin, Utah and Colorado, and Petroleum Potential of the Middle Pennsylvanian Paradox Formation, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2000-O. U.S. Department of Interior. p. 1-13.

Owen, A., Gary, J. N., Hartley, A. J., Weissmann, G. S., and Scuderi, L. A., 2015, QUANTIFICATION OF A DISTRIBUTIVE FLUVIAL SYSTEM: THE SALT WASH DFS OF THE MORRISON FORMATION, SW U.S.A, Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 85, p.546.

United States Geological Survey, 2005, El Malpais - outcrops of Cretaceous Dakota Sandstone:  https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/el-malpais-outcrops-cretaceous-dakota-sandstone . (Accessed May 2020).

United States Geological Survey, n.d., What was Pangea? :  https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-was-pangea-0?qt-news_science_products=0#qt-news_science_products . (Accessed April 2020).

University of Utah, Geology and Geophysics Department, 2018, Carmel Formation:  https://sed.utah.edu/Carmel.htm . (Accessed April 2020).

University of Utah, Geology and Geophysics Department, 2018, Chinle Formation:  https://sed.utah.edu/Chinle.htm . (Accessed April 2020).

University of Utah, Geology and Geophysics Department, 2018, Curtis Formation:  https://sed.utah.edu/Curtis.htm . (Accessed April 2020).

University of Utah, Geology and Geophysics Department, 2018, Entrada Sandstone:  https://sed.utah.edu/Entrada.htm . (Accessed April 2020).

University of Utah, Geology and Geophysics Department, 2018, Kayenta Formation:  https://sed.utah.edu/Kayenta.htm . (Accessed April 2020).

University of Utah, Geology and Geophysics Department, 2018, Moenkopi Formation:  https://sed.utah.edu/Moenkopi.htm . (Accessed April 2020).

University of Utah, Geology and Geophysics Department, 2018, Morrison Formation:  https://sed.utah.edu/Morrison.htm . (Accessed April 2020).

University of Utah, Geology and Geophysics Department, 2018, Page Sandstone:  https://sed.utah.edu/Page.htm . (Accessed April 2020).

University of Utah, Geology and Geophysics Department, 2018, Stop 2-8 Panorama Point:  https://sed.utah.edu/Stop2_8.htm . (Accessed May 2020).

University of Utah, Geology and Geophysics Department, 2018, Summerville Formation:  https://sed.utah.edu/Summerville.htm . (Accessed May 2020).

University of Utah, Geology and Geophysics Department, 2018, White Rim Sandstone:  https://sed.utah.edu/WhiteRim.htm . (Accessed April 2020).

Utah Geologic Survey, n.d., UTAH: A GEOLOGIC HISTORY:  https://geology.utah.gov/popular/general-geology/geologic-history/utah-a-geologic-history/ . (Accessed April 2020).

Schott, R., 2009, San Rafael Swell by Ron Schott:  http://gigapan.com/gigapans/32536 . (Accessed May 2020).

Wilkerson, M.S., 2020, Geological Field Experiences: Utah, DePauw University Department of Geoscience.

Wonderly, C. and National Park Service, 2019, White Rim Sandstone:  https://www.nps.gov/cany/learn/nature/whiterim.htm . (Accessed May 2020).

Figure 1

Gigapan view of the eastside of the San Rafael Swell in Utah where I-70 cuts through it (Schott, 2009).

Figure 2a

Geologic map of the San Rafael Swell in Utah.

Figure 2b

Cross section of the San Rafael Swell in Utah, with the cross section taken from A-A' marked on the geologic map above in Fig. 2a.

Figure 3

Map of Colorado Plateau which extends across Utah, Colorado, Arizona, and New Mexico (Carstens, 2012). Note that the SRS sites was added for reference. 

Figure 4

Stratigraphic column of the San Rafael Swell in Utah with notes on depositional environment and rock appearance.

Figure 5

Paleozoic environment of Utah showing marine and beach environments(Utah Geologic Survey, n.d.).

Figure 6

Permian North America map highlighting the Appalachian Orogenic Belt as Pangea forms (Fillmore, 2000). The Uncompahgre Uplift is shaded in (Fillmore, 2000).

Figure 7

Permian map of Utah depicting the shoreline and paleoenvironment for the White Rim Sandstone and Kaibab Formation (Fillmore, 2000). The Uncompahgre Uplift provides sediments to the Cutler Group, in which the Cutler Group’s White Rim Sandstone developed in a beach dune environment. The younger Kabab Limestone (shaded) is a shallow marine deposit. 

Figure 8

Cutler Group and Kaibab Formation rock sample illustrating the grayish-tan color. A chert nodule is circled in red.

Figure 9

White Rim Sandstone outcrop highlighting the white, resistive sandstone cap seen at the Island in the Sky district of Canyonlands National Park (Wonderly, 2019).

Figure 10

Kaibab Formation outcrop along the Virgin River in Utah (Fitzgerald, 2015).

Figure 11

Moenkopi Formation rock sample with crossbeds highlighted in red.

Figure 12

Moenkopi Formation outcrop at Panorama Point in Capitol Reef National Park (University of Utah, 2018). The lower, cliff-forming red unit is the Moenkopi Formation and the tan Chinle Formation unconformably overlies it.  

Figure 13

Moenkopi Formation Triassic map showcasing how most of Utah was covered in a sea (Fillmore, 2000). 

Figure 14

Late Triassic map of Utah illustrating the northwest-trending fluvial system that helped develop the Chinle Formation (Fillmore, 2000).

Figure 15

Monekopi Formation, Chinle Formation, and Wingate Sandstone outcrop along Highway 24, looking at "The Castle" structure of Wingate Sandstone (University of Utah, 2018).

Figure 16

Chinle Formation hand sample emphasizing the rusty-red color (Wilkerson, 2020).

Figure 17

Wingate Sandstone outcrop at the Island in the Sky District in Canyonlands National Park (Herbert, 2019)

Figure 18

Wingate Sandstone hand sample, with desert varnish circled and faint crossbeds outlined in red. 

Figure 19

Wingate Sandstone map during the Jurassic Period, with the desert erg covering the majority of Utah (Fillmore, 2000).

Figure 20

Kayenta Formation map showing a large, northwest-flowing fluvial system in the Jurassic Period (Fillmore, 2000).

Figure 21

Kayenta Formation outcrop at the Human History Museum at Zion National Park (Fitzgerald, 2015). Its red “ledgey” appearance is emphasized compared to the tan Navajo Sandstone.

Figure 22

Kayenta Formation hand sample with crossbeds emphasized in red.

Figure 23

Navajo Sandstone map of the Colorado Plateau in the Early Jurassic, with Zion National Park starred for refference (Blakey, 2015).

Figure 24

Navajo Sandstone outcrop at Capitol Dome in Capitol Reef National Park (National Park Service, 2020).  

Figure 25

Navajo Sandstone hand specimen displaying the white to tan sandstone and crossbeds (marked in red).

Figure 26

Carmel Formation outcrop showing deformation along Highway 24 in Capitol Reef National Park (University of Utah, 2018).

Figure 27

Carmel Formation hand specimen from the SRS with calcite crystals on both samples.

Figure 28

Carmel Formation map in the Middle Jurassic Period with Zion State National Park starred for reference (Blakey, 2015). The light blue shallow sea extends over most of Utah.

Figure 29

Entrada Sandstone map in the Jurassic Period (Fillmore, 2000). The Carmel Formation tidal flat environment has regressed as the Entrada Sandstone terrestrial environment expands over the Colorado Plateau region. 

Figure 30

Entrada Sandstone outcrop at the South Window in Arches National Park (Herbert, 2018).

Figure 31

Entrada Sandstone hand sample with the crossbeds highlighted in red. 

Figure 32

Outcrop of the Entrada Sandstone, Curtis Formation, Summerville Formation, and Morrison Formation at Cathedral Valley in Capitol Reef National Park (University of Utah, 2018). Unconformities are marked in black. The light-green and gray Curtis Formation is distinguished from the more red Summerville Formation by the color. 

Figure 33

Curtis Formation hand sample illustrating its tan color.

Figure 34

Curtis Formation map showing a marine environment during the Late Jurassic Period (Colorado Plateau Geosystems, 2016).

Figure 35

Summerville Formation outcrop at Hans Flat in Canyonlands National Park (Cox, 2015). Note the striped appearance.

Figure 36

Morrison Formation map of the Colorado Plateau depicting the eastward-flowing fluvial system in the Late Jurassic (Fillmore, 2000). The volcanic arc in the west is still present, and subduction continues to contribute to the Nevadan Orogenic Belt (Wilkerson, 2020).

Figure 37

Tidwell Member, Salt Wash Member, and Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation outcrop at Little Park outcrop site in southwest Utah (Owen et al., 2015).

Figure 38

Cedar Mesa Formation and Dakota Sandstone map of the Cretaceous Period showing the Sevier Orogeny and interior seas (Blakey, 2015). Zion National Park is starred as reference. 

Figure 39

Cedar Mountain Formation outcrop at Hovenweep National Monument (Herbert, 2015). Note the cliff-forming and "blocky" appearance.

Figure 40

Hand samples comparing the coloring of the Mancos Shale, Dakota Sandstone, and Cedar Mountain Formation at Arches National Park (Hendrix, 2007).

Figure 41

Dakota Sandstone outcrop at El Malpais National Monument in New Mexico (U.S. Geological Survey, 2005). 

Figure 42

Cretaceous map of North America illustrating the Sevier Orogenic Belt and Western Interior Seaway, which deposited the Mancos Shale (Fillmore, 2000).

Figure 43

Tununk Shale map of the Colorado Plateau in the Cretaceous Period (Fillmore, 2000). Note that the former shoreline for the Dakota Sandstone is pointed to in the top right-hand corner (Fillmore, 2000).

Figure 44

Blue Gate Shale map of the Colorado Plateau in the Cretaceous Period with the coal formations from the Juana Lopez Shale marked (Fillmore, 2000).     

Figure 45

Mancos Shale slopes below the Book Cliffs in Utah along I-70 (National Park Service, 2015).

Figure 46

Mesa Verde Formation outcrop at Book Cliffs along I-70, with some Mancos Shale present at its base (National Park Service, 2015).

Figure 47

Laramide Orogeny diagram depicting a reverse fault in the basement rock and “draping” sediments above it, resulting in features such as the SRS (Morris et al., 2016).

Figure 48

Early Tertiary map of Utah highlighting normal faults and monoclines, such as the San Rafael Swell (circled in red) and Monument Uplift (Fillmore, 2000).

Figure 49

White Rim Sandstone outcrop at the SRS traced in yellow. This unit was identified by its dendritic outcropping pattern and gray to tan color.

Figure 50

Kaibab Formation and Moenkopi Formation outcropping at the SRS. 

Figure 51

Tan slopes of the Moenkopi Formation indicating Kaibab Formation upper boundary.

Figure 52

Moenkopi Formation and Chinle Formation contact marked in gray. Note that the gray line follows the cliff in the flatiron shape. The white Shinarump Conglomerate Member marks the base of the Chinle Formation.

Figure 53

Wingate Sandstone outcrop at the SRS showcasing the “blocky” appearance.

Figure 54

Wingate Sandstone outcrop highlighting the “marbled” look of the red and tan beds. The Chinle Formation to Wingate Sandstone boundary is marked yellow in Google Earth. The change to light-red indicates the boundary.

Figure 55

Wingate Sandstone to Kayenta Formation boundary in red, with the change in color and "ledgey" appearance of the Kayenta Formation differentiating the units.

Figure 56

Kayenta Sandstone to Navajo Sandstone boundary is marked in dark green and follows along the cliff-forming face of the Navajo Sandstone flatirons.

Figure 57a

Navajo Sandstone to Carmel Formation contact marked in purple follows the abrupt color change from white to brown. South SRS example.

Figure 57b

Navajo Sandstone to Carmel Formation contact marked in purple follows the abrupt color change from white to brown. North SRS Example.

Figure 58a

Carmel Formation and Entrada Sandstone contact marked in light green. Note that it follows along the faint rusty-red outcrop of the Entrada Sandstone but is predominantly covered in alluvium. South SRS example.

Figure 58b

Carmel Formation and Entrada Sandstone contact marked in light green and with alluvium outlined in blue to. Central SRS example.

Figure 59

Entrada Sandstone to Curtis Formation contact marked in red. Note the contact also follows along a cliff.

Figure 60

Curtis Formation to Summerville Formation contact marked in orange. This contacts follows the transition from gray to reddish-brown.

Figure 61

Summerville and Morrison Formation contact marked in pink. Note the sharp contact following the change in color and unconformity between the units.

Figure 62

Morrison Formation and Cedar Mountain Formation contact marked in light blue as it follows the eroded surface between the units.

Figure 63

Mancos Shale smooth eroding pattern compared to the jagged edges of the Cedar Mountain Formation.

Figure 64

Cedar Mountain Formation and Tununk Shale contact marked in light blue. It follows the erosional pattern of the Mancos Shale.

Figure 65

The Tununk Shale and Juana Lopez Shale contact follows a sharp cliff and overall erosional pattern of the Mancos Shale. The contact is marked in green.

Figure 66

The Tununk Shale and Juana Lopez Shale contact follows the transition from gray to brown. The Juana Lopez Shale and Blue Gate Shale contact, marked in lime-green, follows the transition from brown to tan.

Table 1

Data provided by M. S. Wilkerson and data selected to calculate apparent dip.

Figure 2a: Geologic map of the San Rafael Swell in Utah.

Figure 2b: Cross section of the San Rafael Swell in Utah, with the cross section taken from A-A' marked on the geologic map above in Fig. 2a.

Figure 3: Map of Colorado Plateau which extends across Utah, Colorado, Arizona, and New Mexico (Carstens, 2012). Note that the SRS sites was added for reference. 

Figure 4: Stratigraphic column of the San Rafael Swell in Utah with notes on depositional environment and rock appearance.

Figure 47: Laramide Orogeny diagram depicting a reverse fault in the basement rock and “draping” sediments above it, resulting in features such as the SRS (Morris et al., 2016).

Early Tertiary map of Utah highlighting normal faults and monoclines, such as the San Rafael Swell (circled in red) and Monument Uplift (Fillmore, 2000).

Figure 2a: Geologic map of the San Rafael Swell in Utah.

Figure 49: White Rim Sandstone outcrop at the SRS traced in yellow. This unit was identified by its dendritic outcropping pattern and gray to tan color.

Figure 52: Moenkopi Formation and Chinle Formation contact marked in gray. Note that the gray line follows the cliff in the flatiron shape. The white Shinarump Conglomerate Member marks the base of the Chinle Formation.

Figure 55: Wingate Sandstone to Kayenta Formation boundary in red, with the change in color and "ledgey" appearance of the Kayenta Formation differentiating the units.

Figure 59: Entrada Sandstone to Curtis Formation contact marked in red. Note the contact also follows along a cliff.

Figure 60: Curtis Formation to Summerville Formation contact marked in orange. This contacts follows the transition from gray to reddish-brown.

Figure 62: Morrison Formation and Cedar Mountain Formation contact marked in light blue as it follows the eroded surface between the units.

Table 1: Data provided by M. S. Wilkerson and data selected to calculate apparent dip .

Figure 2a: Geologic map of the San Rafael Swell in Utah.

Figure 2b: Cross section of the San Rafael Swell in Utah, with the cross section taken from A-A' marked on the geologic map above in Fig. 2a.