Focus on Oceans

Let's show 70% of the Earth in new ways

NASA's famous "blue marble" image popularised an ocean view of the Earth. But recently the Spilhaus projection by Bojan Šavrič et al. allowed a truly ocean-centric earth view. They explained its genesis in another  story map  and John Nelson made a base available for use on desktop and online. Also on  Geolounge , Katarina Samurović covered its genesis, and a context similar to here.

Update: Go to §3: CLIWOC Archive, to see Rumsey Collection's 1790 historic world map as base.

Update 2: Go to §11: Long Haul flights that show well on Spilhaus, for a #30DayMapChallenge

CLIWOC

Having repurposed CLImate data for the World OCeans, it seemed natural to post tall ships trajectories and weather data in such a way. That can be seen in  this story map  showing examples of layouts and this video.

All 430K points are displayed here, and stepped through in ten year intervals first for nationalities, then for wind speed and direction, and lastly for Capts. de la Pérouse and Cook on their famous voyages.

The video was created from screenshots taken off ArcGIS Pro Desktop. Next let's see some live web maps and how that was achieved.

CLIWOC Lite

First are the ships by nation. Note that the four main exploring nations are listed, but not Portugal - the CLIWOC project was an EU consortium that did not include them* - the four languages entailed  significant lookup table work , which in fact doubled the number of points from just over ¼M to just under ½M: They were decimated** in order to post under 10K points online. These are also time-aware so step through them 10 years at a time from 1740 to 1855.

*: "My recollection was that the 1755 tsunami, quake and subsequent fires in Lisbon destroyed many of the archives. Those that survived were sold off to private collectors and whilst they may well exist are untraceable. Remember that CLIWOC ran some 20 years ago now and developments have been substantial since then. Old Portuguese records were not available when we worked on the project." (Dennis Wheeler, pers. comm., 2020)

**: 1/50 points using the  modulo function , thanks Simon Kettle then @ Exprodat, who also posted since the  World Port Index  used later here.

CLIWOC Lite (cont.)

This next one shows wind force and direction on the same decimated ship spots as the previous map.

This also took some  significant work  to get wind force and direction data. They were decimated* in order to post only 48K points online. These are also time-aware so step through them 10 years at a time from 1750 to 1855.

This Spilhaus projection avoids having to pick either the central meridian or the amount of distortion as described in this  story map .

CLIWOC Archive

Having recently found the map described below, I re-post it here in Spilhaus projection, isn't it grand?

 World Maps--1790 and 1812--with sample explorer routes  [...] is a mash-up of two maps from the David Rumsey Historical Map Collection. A very small sample of his collection is now contained inside ArcGIS Online. Added to this map are two 18th century explorer routes... Added to the map are two explorer routes--the second voyage of British explorer James Cook and the ill-fated expedition of French explorer Jean-Francois de Laperouse. These data were obtained from the CLIWOC study of sailing ship logs covering 1750-1850.

Originally posted on defunct aizonline account, this was retrieved from jnbellin, who is thanked for preserving it.

CLIWOC Lite (ends)

Added are decimated CLIWOC wind force / direction and ship locations / nationality from a Spilhaus project [below], where Rumsey basemaps can't be reprojected. Note the difference in dot-density between complete Cook / de la Perouse [above] and decimated "Lite" layers [here]. Note also the back story on original  2004 web post  and  2014 blog post .

Climate

Next let's look at Koppen Geiger climate zones and hurricane traces. Capital cities are added to help orient and as a proxy for population density, but can be turned off for more clarity.

The climate zone classification is from Peel's original update published  here  with a set of descriptions  here . These are evidently terrestrial classifications based on work early last century.

Time-enabled observed and predicted climate shifts from 1901-2100 using Koppen-Geiger climate classification cannot be shown in this projection. It can be viewed  here , and slightly less distorted in Equal Earth is here.

Zoom in first and then turn on the hurricane traces from NOAA (press the » to get the layer list) , which are both marine and terrestrial. You will better see patterns in an area that interests you: Isn't it interesting to compare them to local climate zones?

Global shipping

The best use however of this projection, is to grasp global shipping patterns. Here is  Global Shipping and Fishing data in 2013  from National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS) "Cumularive human impact on the ocean"... Zoom in a little to better see patterns in an area that might interest you!

Let's zoom in to the Mediterranean to see medieval Genoese and Venetian shipping from Georgeanne Hribar's " Medieval Shipping Routes ".

Let's zoom in to the English channel, to see  Distributive flow lines modelling traffic between East Anglia and Belgian/Dutch lowlands . See  here  how this modelled simple straight-line traffic as part of  another  story map on East Anglia mentioning the medieval wool trade (go to History > Transport to continent).

Piracy

This map aggregates data by hex bins and posts them with firefly symbology to give an arresting view of piracy today. Johm Nelson's  Piracy aggregation  shows 40 years of nautical piracy incidents, provided by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency aggregated into 40,000 square kilometer hexagonal zones. Let's see these in context in the maps below:

 World Port Index  gives the location, characteristics, known facilities, and available services of a ports, shipping facilities and oil terminals throughout the world.  Global shipping and fishing  depicts commercial shipping activities in 2013 from the study “Cumulative human impact on the ocean” by the National Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS).

 Oil terminals  provides the location, characteristics, known facilities, and available services of ports that have an oil terminal.  Flanders Maritime Institute  provides 200 nautical miles exclusive economic zone polygons including joint and overlapping areas.

Ocean currents

Let's look at the  major wind-driven currents of the world  derived from NOAA mainly. This view makes it a lot easier to grasp the currents on what is a relatively simple map but looks complicated on standard web:

Major Ocean Currents

 Estimate of Plastic Pollution in the World's Oceans (plastic size class 0.33 - 1.00 mm)  is a map of the field locations where count density was measured between 2007-2013. Hot colours show plastics tend to (but not always) appear at ocean 'quiet zones' away from major currents.

Capital cities are shown as a proxy for population density at s global scale, as they tend to be large population centres. And Exclusive Economic Zones are also a proxy for areas of exploitation in the ocean. While plastics pollution is far more complex issue, this map displays things clearly.

Flight MH370

The 8 March, 2014 Malaysian Airline flight bound for Beijing and lost at sea at an unknown location started a frenzy of technical collaboration among many agencies. A backgrounder from Esri's Dawn Wright's  depiction  sets a context for pieces of the puzzle posted by Esri(UK)'s Ben Flanagan. World capitals also show some context. Check the legend and pan/zoom around to explore what is known.

This closeup shows  global shipping and fishing in 2013 , the year before: One sees how remote the possible crash site was, adding to the challenge of detection and recovery! Again it's a far more complex topic than a simple overlay, but this map centred on a possible area of interest is very clear.

What trajectory?

Participating in  #30DayMapChallenge  is truly a community experience! A post by  @pheebely  inspired me to use Spilhaus projection once more. In fact I learned about dark background, creating my own blank basemap (see at very bottom of this  story map ) and the difference between great circle (shortest distance) or azimuthal (constant bearing) trajectories. Not only that, but asking  @edparsons  a mapmaker and pilot, came up with a third solution, conformal! Look at the web map below to see the difference between great circle (geodesic) and azimuthal (rhumb). And see below that a short course on map projection by Spilhaus co-author  @BojanSavric :

Tech Corner:

"On a sphere, geodesic, great circle, and normal section curves are exactly the same. They only differ on ellipsoids, such as WGS 1984. Geodesic curve is the shortest path on the surface of the ellipsoid between two points. This curve cannot be put on a flat plane, or being created by an intersection of the ellipsoidal surface and a plane going through two points. In other words, it is a 3D surface curve. Great Circle on a sphere or Great Elliptic on an ellipsoid, because it is an ellipse, is defined by the intersection of the ellipsoidal surface and a plane going through three points: two points on the surface and the geometric center of the ellipsoid. Because it is defined differently, it does not match a geodesic curve. Normal Section curve is defined by intersection of the ellipsoidal surface and a plane, which is defined by the end point and a normal at the start point. If the plane for the normal section is defined in the opposite direction, this is by the start point and a normal at the end point, it will be different. Geodesic curve falls in between those two normal section curves. Normals on the ellipsoid, except in rare occasions, do not go through the geometric center of the ellipsoid as they do on the sphere. Therefore, these curves does not match great elliptic curve. Because their definitions, rhumb lines, normal sections, and great elliptics tent to be longer than geodesic curve, which is the shortest path between two points on the surface of the ellipsoid. Of course, there are exceptions to these descriptions, but this might just complicate things for you right now.

[...] What projection might effect is which lines are shown as straight lines. For example, gnomonic projection displays all great circle/elliptic curves as straight lines and Mercator shows rhumb lines as straight lines. Also, not all conformal projections display all azimuths correctly. Because Mercator displays rhumb lines as straight lines and the north pole is always up, measured compass bearing are correct. This is not totally true for any other conformal projection including Spilhaus configuration or Adams Square II projection. On UTM, State Plane, or UPS projected coordinate systems, distortion are so low within their areas of use that one can assume straight line is the shortest and direct path. On more global scales, all these assumptions disappear and you get gross distortions of the world."

 

Major Ocean Currents