We Can Build a More Equitable Portland

This Environmental Justice Scorecard illuminates injustices of the past and present to vision a more equitable future.

Introduction

The Braided River Environmental Justice (EJ) Scorecard is divided by neighborhood coalition and scores Portland neighborhoods based on the presence or absence of 13 EJ principles. Environmental justice addresses the fact that those who live, work, and play in the most polluted environments are commonly low income people and people of color. The modern environmental justice movement is usually traced back to Warren County, North Carolina in 1982 when predominately Black residents mobilized to block the dumping of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in their community. Environmental justice is an intersectional approach that acknowledges the environmental work done by people of color. As such, this scorecard was developed collaboratively with the input of Portland’s environmental activists, non-profits, and community members.

Like cities across the U.S., Portland has a history of using planning tools like zoning to concentrate negative environmental impacts in poor communities and/or communities of color. The state has a history of Black exclusion laws, making it illegal for Black people to live or own property in Oregon. The last of these laws was not repealed until 1926 (Nokes, 2020). As far as we know, communities in Oregon did not use racial zoning, or the practice of overtly designating geographical locations for different races. However, private developers were allowed to place racially restrictive covenants on their properties. These covenants were legal clauses written into the deed of the property restricting who could own or live on the property as well as who the property could be sold to based on race (BPS, 2019). In the 1930s, ‘40s, and’50s, the city rezone large swaths of the city to single family only. These changes were justified as protecting property values and making it easier for homeowners to obtain Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans. At the same time, Portland was also reshaped by the federal government's practice of redlining. Redlining was based on maps from the HomeOwners Loan Corporation (HOLC) and determined whether or not neighborhoods could get federal loan assistance for buying and maintaining a home. Redlined areas were seen as a bad investment and often housed a concentration of Black residents (BPS, 2019).

In the 1960s and ‘70s, the city fully bought into the urban renewal craze. Backed by federal government funding, the city set out to renew “blighted” neighborhoods through demolition and rebuilding. Many so-called “blighted” neighborhoods were formerly redlined neighborhoods home to Black communities, immigrant communities, and other historically-marginalized groups. Though we have been realigning our priorities as a city, these planning mechanisms have clearly shaped the segregation still present in our city and prompted the trends of gentrification. This scorecard highlights where these disparities exist and attempts to unpack what planning decisions led to the current landscape of Portland. We hope that this scorecard uncovers places in which we can make our communities more sustainable in terms of the environment, racial justice, and economic well-being.


Land Acknowledgement

We acknowledge that we are on the traditional village sites of the Multnomah, Kathlemet, and Clackamas bands of Chinook, Tualatin Kalapuya, Molalla and many other tribes who made their homes along the Columbia River. The Multnomah are a band of Chinooks that lived in this area.

We thank the descendants of these tribes for being the original stewards and protectors of these lands and waters since time immemorial. We acknowledge that Portland, OR has the 9th largest urban Native American population in the US with over 380 tribes represented in the region. We also acknowledge the systemic policies of genocide, relocation and assimilation that impact many indigenous and Native American families to this day.

We are honored to be guests upon these lands and waters. We pay our respect to elders, both past and present, who have stewarded this land throughout generations, through today.


Northwest Portland Scorecard

Southwest Portland Scorecard

North Portland Scorecard

Northeast Portland Scorecard

Central Northeast Portland Scorecard

East Portland Scorecard

Southeast Portland Scorecard

Implications

This analysis is meant to highlight the decisions made by local government that have led to the inequitable city we currently live in. While we often contrast the east and west sides of the city, this analysis shows that a simple dichotomy does not tell the whole story. There are clear differences in the inequities faced on either side of the river, however this distinction is only really evident between Southeast and Southwest Portland and the far west and east sides of the city. 

North, Northeast, and Northwest Portland tell similar stories of displacement, generational poverty, and environmental harm. North and Northwest Portland have contended with a polluted river, a designated EPA Superfund site, for decades. This chronic environmental hazard presented by the Superfund impacts indigenous water rights, subsistence fishing, the health of pets and people who recreate in the river, the health of adults and children alike, the functioning of pollinators, and so on. The CEI Hub, located on the northwest banks of the Willamette, threatens an even more desperate environmental catastrophe in the North Reach of the Willamette. Sitting atop a fault line, the state’s largest fossil fuel hub, is poised to pollute the river beyond repair in the event and endangers nearby residents in the event of an explosion. 

Air pollution, insufficient tree canopy, and food apartheid impact East Portland neighborhoods almost ubiquitously. East Portland was hit especially hard by the heat wave due to lack of canopy. In East Portland and throughout the city, insufficient tree canopy can be found alongside industrial zoning. Despite covering 20% of the city’s land, industrial zones only contain about 6% of the city’s urban canopy (PPR, 2018). Furthermore, heavy industrial zones along with a variety of industrial uses (including rail, waste, and mining uses) are exempt from on-site tree density standards contributing to greater urban heat in those surrounding areas (Title 11.50.050.B). While industry and industrial zoning is essential to Portland’s prosperity, it is clear that regulations that cater to industry can put surrounding communities at risk.

While this may all feel too big and hard to deal with, the current inequities are the results of past decisions and addressing them can also begin with community, environment, and equity-informed decisions. These neighborhood scores are intended to spark discussion about future planning decisions in Portland. The question is not where’s the best place to live, but rather how did Portland get here and how can we shift to creating more equitable neighborhoods. Our vision demands equitable neighborhoods, where all residents have opportunity, health, and access to our city’s natural resources. We see a future where there is no better neighborhood that has less pollution and more amenities, but rather one where every neighborhood meets residents’ basic needs.  


Sources

Abbott, C. (2018). South Portland/South Auditorium Urban Renewal Project. Oregon Encyclopedia. https://www.oregonencyclopedia.org/articles/south_portland_south_auditorium_urban_renewal_project/#.YPclwpNud_R 

Aleck, J. (2017). Displacement of black Portlanders began long ago. KOIN 6. https://www.koin.com/news/displacement-of-black-portlanders-began-long-ago/870080775/ 

Anderson, M.R. (2008). History Under the Bridge. OregonLive, The Oregonian. https://www.oregonlive.com/stjohns/2008/06/history_under_bridge.html 

Bates, L.K. (2013). Gentrification and Displacement Study: Implementing and Equitable Inclusive Development Strategy in the Context of Gentrification. PDX Scholar. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1082&context=usp_fac 

Bellinson, R. (2016). The Pearl: A Gentrification Story from Portland. The Protocity.com. http://theprotocity.com/the-pearl-gentrification-portland/ 

City of Milkwaukie. (n.d.). Milwaukie Zoning. https://www.portlandmaps.com/bps/zoning/#/map/ 

City of Portland. (n.d.). City of Portland Annexation History. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/cbo/article/339545

City of Portland, Title 11.50.050 (Updated 2020). https://www.portland.gov/code/11/50/050 

Ellis, R. (2020). Portland took these Black families’ homes. Some of their descendants want reparations. Oregon Public Broadcast. https://www.opb.org/article/2020/12/16/portland-oregon-affordable-housing-reparations/ 

Fair Housing Council of Oregon. (2020). Urban Renewal History and the I-5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project. http://fhco.org/index.php/news/blog-2/item/32-urban-renewal-history-and-the-i-5-rose-quarter-improvement-project 

Goodling, E., Green, J., & McClintock, N. (2015). Uneven Development of the Sustainable City: Shifting Capital in Portland, Oregon. Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/107 

Killen, J. (2015). Throwback Thursday: 60 years ago, Portland began urban renewal plan for South Auditorium District. OregonLive, The Oregonian, https://www.oregonlive.com/history/2015/02/throwback_thursday_60_years_ag.html 

Lee, R. (n.d.). History of Linnton. Linnton Neighborhood Association. https://linntonna.org/about/historical-linnton/ 

Lynes, A. (2018). ‘Not in Cully’: What happened to the neighborhood that was supposed to stay affordable? OregonLive, The Oregonian. https://www.oregonlive.com/business/2018/06/not_in_cully_what_happened_to.html 

Mesh, A. (2017). Razed and Confused. Willamette Week. https://www.wweek.com/portland/article-21792-razed-confused.html 

Metro. (2020). Regional Barometer: Tree Canopy. https://regionalbarometer.oregonmetro.gov/maps/drcMetro::tree-canopy/explore?location=45.433923%2C-122.587910%2C2.62 

Native Land Digital. (n.d.). Native Land. https://native-land.ca/

Nelson, S. (2019). History of Cully. The Cully Association of Neighbors. http://www.cullyneighbors.org/history-of-cully/ 

Nokes, G. (2020). Black Exclusion Laws in Oregon. Oregon Encyclopedia. https://www.oregonencyclopedia.org/articles/exclusion_laws/#.YSaGx9Nud_Q 

Oaster, B. (2021). Uncovering industrial NW Portland’s twisted past in an effort to save its future. Street Roots. https://www.streetroots.org/news/2021/06/09/digging-industrial-nw-portland-s-twisted-past-effort-save-its-future 

Oregon Department of Transportation. (2021). ODOT TransGIS. https://gis.odot.state.or.us/transgis/ 

Oregon Revised Statutes, State of Oregon § 457.010(1) (2019). https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors457.html 

Oregon State University. (n.d.). All About PAHs. https://superfund.oregonstate.edu/all-about-pahs 

PedPDX. (n.d.). Portland’s Citywide Pedestrian Plan. https://pdx.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=f0b9f95b3fc44cff946bd58707e99bb2 

Peel, S. (2021). This Is the Hottest Place in Portland. Willamette Week. https://www.wweek.com/news/city/2021/07/14/this-is-the-hottest-place-in-portland/ 

Portland Bureau of Environmental Services. (n.d.) Willamette River History. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bes/article/231478

Portland Bureau of Planning. (2003). Northwest District Plan and Appendices. https://www.portland.gov/sites/default/files/2020-01/northwest-district-plan-appendices-2003.pdf 

Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability. (2009). Portland Plan: Map 3-10. Pedestrian System Infrastructure Condition and Capacity. https://www.portlandonline.com/portlandplan/index.cfm?a=288100&c=52256 

Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability. (2018). 2018 Gentrification and Displacement Neighborhood Typology Assessment. https://www.portland.gov/sites/default/files/2020-01/gentrification_displacement_typology_analysis_2018_10222018.pdf

Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability. (2009). East Portland Historical Overview and Historic Preservation Study. https://www.portlandonline.com/portlandplan/index.cfm?a=346260&c=51427

Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability. (2019). Historical Context of Racist Planning: A History of How Planning Segregated Portland. https://www.portland.gov/sites/default/files/2019-12/portlandracistplanninghistoryreport.pdf 

Portland Housing Bureau. (n.d.). Displacement in North and Northeast Portland- A Historical Overview. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/phb/article/655460 

Portland Maps. (n.d.) Portland Zoning. https://www.portlandmaps.com/bps/zoning/#/map/ 

Portland Parks and Recreation Urban Forestry Staff. (2018). Tree Canopy and Potential in Portland, OR. https://www.portland.gov/sites/default/files/2020-08/tree-canopy-and-potential-2018.pdf 

Regional Equity Atlas. (n.d.). Asthma. http://www.equityatlas.org/atlas-maps-print-view/asthma 

Rose, J. (2014). Joseph Rose: I-84s odd lack of freeway exits in Portland messes with human evolution. OregonLive, The Oregonian. https://www.oregonlive.com/commuting/2014/10/joseph_rose_i-84s_odd_lack_of.html 

Skelton, R. & Miller, V. (2016). The Environmental Justice Movement. NRDC. https://www.nrdc.org/stories/environmental-justice-movement 

Soleil, C. (2020). New Businesses in East Portland Were Accused Last Week of Contributing to Gentrification. Willamette Week. https://www.wweek.com/news/2020/01/28/new-lents-businesses-were-accused-of-contributing-to-gentrification-last-week/ 

Sullivan’s Gulch Neighborhood Association. (n.d.). Sullivan’s Gulch Neighborhood Plan: Foreword. https://www.sullivansgulch.org/neighborhood-plan.html 

Taylor, S. (2021). In feedback to the author.

Tsai, M. (2016). Our Heritage, Our History Part 1: Portland Chinatown’s Beginnings and Displacement. Asian Pacific American Network of Oregon. https://www.apano.org/2016/05/09/our-heritage-our-history-part-1-portland-chinatowns-beginnings-and-displacement/ 

Tsai, M. (2016). Our Heritage, Our History Part 2: Portland Chinese-American Displacement and Migration. Asian Pacific American Network of Oregon. https://www.portlandonline.com/portlandplan/index.cfm?a=346260&c=51427 

United States Department of Agriculture. (2019). Food Access Research Atlas. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-access-research-atlas/

United States Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Learn about Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs). https://www.epa.gov/pcbs/learn-about-polychlorinated-biphenyls-pcbs 

United States Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). What is Superfund? https://www.epa.gov/superfund/what-superfund 

United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). What is liquefaction? https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-liquefaction?qt-news_science_products=0#qt-news_science_products 

University of Richmond, Digital Scholarship Lab. (n.d.). Mapping Inequity: Redlining in New Deal America. https://dsl.richmond.edu/panorama/redlining/#loc=11/45.513/-122.817&city=portland-or 

Urban Nest Realty. (2016). An All-Purpose Guide to the Concordia Neighborhood in Portland. https://www.urbannestpdx.com/life-in-portland/2016/8/25/an-all-purpose-guide-to-the-concordia-neighborhood-in-portland 

Wang, Y., Bartlett, S.F., & Miles, S.B. (2012). Earthquake Risk Study for Oregon’s Critical Energy Infrastructure Hub. Department of Geology and Mineral Industries. https://www.oregongeology.org/earthquakes/CEI-Hub-report.pdf 

Wollner, C., Provo, J., & Schablisky, J. (2019). Brief History of Urban Renewal in Portland, Oregon. https://prosperportland.us/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Brief-History-of-Urban-Renewal-in-Portland-2005-Wollner-Provo-Schablisky.pdf